The Overemphasized Legacy of the Napoleonic Code

Authors

  • Zilei Li Worcester Academy
  • Carlos Hernández Southern Methodist University
  • María José Villalba Giubi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsr.v11i3.1645

Keywords:

codification, Napoleon, civil law, jurisprudence, Revolution, Roman law, legislation, equality, republicanism, property, contract, tort, case law

Abstract

When we discuss the legacies of Napoleon, it is inevitable to disregard his contribution to global jurisprudence: the French Civil Code of 1804. As Emperor, Napoleon proposed to enhance his military achievements with a comprehensive codification. Although he was not the precedent in doing so, it was him who created the paradigm of all codes that we now consider “modern.” For decades, historians investigating the course of Napoleon’s codification have developed a plausible explanation of its unparalleled significance in the world; that is, it extensively embodies the ideas of the radical French Revolution, which undermined feudal regimes and shaped modern society. However, this argument reflects a common tendency of glossing the Code by adding personal interpretations through modern lenses; it is neither objective nor inaccurate. The first part of this study is largely based on James Gordley’s essay (1994) on the myths of Napoleon’s codification. We will see that ideas expressed in the Code were not as novel to people in the nineteenth century as principles of the Revolution were, because many concepts were proposed by early French writers and framers of Roman law. In the second part of the study, we will investigate the relation between codification and the modern world. We will use Latin America as an instance to illustrate the limitations of the Code due to its relative antiquity. When we combine the conclusions of the two parts, it is plain that the legacy of Napoleon’s Code is often overemphasized in the modern world.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Carlos Hernández, Southern Methodist University

William P. Clements Department of History, A. Kenneth Pye Visiting Assistant Professor

María José Villalba Giubi

Financial Services Lawyer 

Graduate Coach

References or Bibliography

Adams, J. (1787). A Defense of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America.

Amos, M. (1928). The Code Napoléon and the Modern World. Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, 10(4), 222-236. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/753418

Aquinas, T. (1963). Summa theologica (3rd ed.). Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos.

Aristotle. (1905). Aristotle’s Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Arnaud, A.-J. (1969). Les origines doctrinales du Code civil français. Strasbourg: FeniXX réédition numérique.

Bartels, N. M., & Madden, M. S. (2001, Spring). A Comparative Analysis of United States and Colombian Tort Law: Duty, Breach, and Damages. Pace International Law Review, 13(1), 60-92. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1204&context=pilr

Brissaud, J. (1912). History of French Private Law. Translated by Rapelje Howell. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.

Bürge, A. (1991). Das französische Privatrecht im 19. Jahrhundert zwischen Tradition und Pandektenwissenschaft, Liberalismus und Etatismus. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.

Cambacérès, J.-J.-R. (an IV, messidor). Discours préliminaire prononcé par Cambacérès, au Conseil des cinq cents, lors de la présentation du troisième Projet de Code civil.

Carbonnier, J. (1977). Droit civil (11th ed., Vol. I). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

Code civil (1804). https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000006428859/

De La Morandière, L. J. (1948, November). The Reform of the French Civil Code. Translated by Kurt H. Nadelmann. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 97(1), 1-21. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3309648.

De Montholon, C. T. (1847). Récits de la captivité de l'empereur Napoléon à Sainte-Hélène. Paris: Paulin.

Diez-Picazo, L. (1992). Codificación, descodificación y recodificación. Anuario de Derecho Civil, 471-484. Retreived from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/11054/11566

Discussion devant le conseil des cinq cents, sur le troisième projet de Cambacérès. (an V, pluviôse 9).

Duranton, A. (1844). Cours de droit français suivant le Code civil (3rd ed.). Paris: G. Thorel Libraire; Paris: Guilbert Libraire.

Fisher, H. A. L. (1906). The Codes. The Cambridge Modern History (Vol. IX). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gordley, J. (1994, Summer). Myths of the French Civil Code. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 42(3), 459-505. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/840698

Gratianus, active 1151 (the Canonist). (1855). Decretum Gratiani, emendatum et notationibus illustratum Gregorii XIII Pont. Max. Paris: J.-P. Migne.

Halpérin, J.-L. (1992). L'impossible code civil. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

Ilbert, C. (1905). The Centenary of the French Civil Code. Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation, 6(2), 218-231. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/752037

Jaubert, F. (an XII, ventôse 30). Discours prononcé devant le Corps législatif.

Justinian. (1865). Corpus juris civilis. Leipzig: Baumgaetner.

Kelley, D. R. (2002, Summer). Napoleonic Code and Roman Law. History of Political Thought, 23(2), 288-302. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26219837

Lira, B. B. (1998). Estudios de derecho y cultura de abogados en Chile 1758-1998: tras la huella ius commune, la codificación y la descodificación en el Nuevo Mundo. Scientific Electronic Library Online (Chile). Retrieved from https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-54551998000200003

Lobingier, C. (1918, December). Napoleon and His Code. Harvard Law Review, 32(2), 114-134. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1327640.

Miller, J. A. (1985). Products Liability in Argentina. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 33(4), 611-636. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/840452.

Mirow, M. C. (2005). The Code Napoléon: Buried but Ruling in Latin America. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 33(2), 179-194. Retreived from https://ecollections.law.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1115&context=faculty_publications.

Portalis, J.-E.-M. (an IX, pluviôse). Discours préliminaire prononcé lors de la présentation du projet de la Commission du gouvernement.

Portalis, J.-E.-M. (an XII, ventôse 28). Présentation et exposé des motifs devant le Corps-Législatif.

Toullier, C. B. M. (1828). Le Droit civil français suivant l'ordre du Code (4th ed., Vol. III). Paris: Imprimerie de J. M. Vatar.

Weill, A., & Terré, F. (1986). Droit civil: les obligations (4th ed.). Paris: Dalloz.

Published

03-08-2023

How to Cite

Li, Z., Hernández, C., & Villalba Giubi, M. J. (2023). The Overemphasized Legacy of the Napoleonic Code. Journal of Student Research, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsr.v11i3.1645

Issue

Section

Research Articles