Behavioral Economics and the Democratization of Education
Exploring Heuristics and Biases to Increase Economic Diversity at Top Universities in the United States
Keywords:
Education, Diversity, University, Universities, Colleges, Behavioral EconomicsAbstract
Despite affordability, many high-achieving students coming from disadvantaged backgrounds do not apply to the most competitive universities in the United States. Minding the democratizing power of high-quality education, such a phenomenon only allows inequality to perpetuate from a generation to another. This paper explores the ways in which five heuristics and biases can affect a low-income student’s reluctance to seek admission to the country’s best schools. Splitting the decision-making process into three stages, I argue that: (1) underconfidence and availability impact the prediction of admission chances, (2) framing triggers an anchoring effect influencing the assessment of attendance feasibility, and (3) representativeness sways the estimation of post-enrollment success. To mitigate these errors in judgment, the policies I propose consist of course simulation programs, engaging same-background university students in school talks, a reversed advertisement of costs, and a matching system for campus visits based on socioeconomic background.
References or Bibliography
Kevin Carey, “How Much Does Getting into an Elite College Actually Matter?” The New York Times, March 15, 2019. Accessed August 2021.
Gregor Aisch, Larry Buchanan, Amanda Cox, Kevin Quealy, “Some Colleges Have More Students From the Top 1 Percent Than the Bottom 60. Find Yours.” The New York Times, 18 January 2017. Accessed August 2021.
U.S News & World Report. 2021. “2021 Best National University Rankings.” usnews.com. Accessed August 2021.
Walton Radford, Alexandria. “’No Point in Applying’: Why Poor Students Are Missing at Top Colleges.” The Atlantic, 16 September 2013. Accessed August 2021.
Blumenstyk, Goldie. ”American Higher Education in Crisis?: What Everyone Needs to Know.” Oxford University Press, 2014.
Hoxby, Caroline M., and Cristopher Avery. “The Missing ”One-Offs”: The Hidden Supply of High-Achieving, Low-Income Students.” Background on College Policies Directed Toward Low-Income, High-Achieving Students. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, no. Spring 2013, 2012, pp. 1-50.
Walton Radford, Alexandria. “Top Student, Top School? How Social Class Shapes Where Valedictorians Go to College”. American Institutes for Research, 2013.
Hoxby, Caroline M., and Cristopher Avery. “The Missing ”One-Offs”: The Hidden Supply of High-Achieving, Low-Income Students.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, no. Spring 2013, 2012, pp. 1-50.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. “Origins”. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.
APA Dictionary of Psychology. “Underconfidence.” American Psychological Association. Accessed August 2021.
Filippin, Antonio; Paccagnella, Marco (2011): Family background, self-confidence, and economic outcomes. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 6117. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Evans G. W. (2004). The environment of childhood poverty. Am. Psychol. 59 77–92.
Parker J. S., Benson M. J. (2004). The impact of parental support, behavioral control, and psychological control on the academic achievement and self-esteem of African American and European American adolescents. Adolescence 39:519.
Green, Erica L. “A College Program for Disadvantaged Teens Could Shake Up Elite Admissions.” The New York Times, 18 February 2021. Accessed August 2021.
Twenge, J. M., and Campbell, W. K. (2002). Self-esteem and socioeconomic status: a meta-analytic review. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 6, 59–71.
Walton Radford, Alexandria. “’No Point in Applying’: Why Poor Students Are Missing at Top Colleges.” The Atlantic, 16 September 2013. Accessed August 2021.
Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. “The Science of Availability”. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.
Smith, Kelly. “The Use of Cognitive Heuristics in College Choice.” Loyola eCommons, 1988.
Jaschik, Scott. “The Missing Students.” 2012. Inside Higher Ed. Accessed August 2021.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
Hogarth, R. M. (1987). Judgment and choice: The psychology of decision (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Yale University. “Financial Aid.” Accessed August 2021.
APA Dictionary of Psychology. “Framing”. American Psychological Association. Accessed August 2021.
Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions.”
Morgan, Elizabeth. “NCAN Study Confirms Lack of Awareness about Student Aid for College.” National College Attainment Network, 2016. Accsessed August 2021.
Haveman, Robert, and Timothy Smeeding. “The Role of Higher Education in Social Mobility.”, 2006.
Light, Audrey; Strayer, Wayne. “Determinants of college completion: School quality or student ability?” Journal of Human Resources 35. 2 (Apr 2000): 299-332.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
Oxford Reference. “Simulation Heuristic.” Accessed August 2021.
Downloads
Posted
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ruxandra Sorocianu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright holder for this article has granted JSR.org a license to display the article in perpetuity.
