Life and Death:
The Effect of Biases and Heuristics on Medical Decision Making
Keywords:
Medical Decision Making, Biases, HeuristicsAbstract
Doctors’ decision making is affected by a variety of cognitive shortcuts and biases. Five biases and heuristics extremely relevant to medical decision making are the availability heuristic, anchoring, sunk cost bias, omission bias, and status quo bias. By conducting literature reviews involving the analysis and evaluation of largely quantitative data, this paper analyses these five biases and the extent to which they affect doctors, as well as the roles they play in medicine. Finally, this paper recommends a range of policies which aim to alleviate the negative effects of these heuristics and biases on medical decision making.
References or Bibliography
[BBB12] Jennifer A. Braverman and J.S. Blumenthal-Barby. Assessment of the
sunk-cost effect in clinical decision-making. Social Science & Medicine,
[Col10] Martin D. Coleman. Sunk cost and commitment to medical treatment.
Current Psychology, 2010.
[CS21] Adrian R. Camilleri and Sunita Sah. Amplification of the status quo
bias among physicians making medical decisions. Applied Cognitive
Psychology, 2021.
[ea85] A E Voytovich et al. Premature conclusions in diagnostic reasoning.
Academic Medicine, 1985.
[ea91] Norbert Schwartz et al. Ease of retrieval as information: Another
look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 1991.
[ea99] Brian H. Bornstein et al. Rationality in medical treatment decisions:
Is there a sunk-cost effect? Social Science & Medicine, 1999.
[ea05] Scott K. Abergg et al. Omission bias and decision making in pul-
monary and critical care medicine. Chest, 2005.
[ea08] Omar Merlo et al. Heuristics revisited: Implications for marketing
research and practice. Marketing Theory, 2008.
[ea19] Drew Roselli et al. Managing bias in ai. Companion Proceedings of
The 2019 World Wide Web Conference, 2019.
[ea20a] Hannah T. Neprash et al. Measuring primary care exam length using
electronic health record data. Medical Care, 2020.
[ea20b] Ping Li et al. Availability bias causes misdiagnoses by physicians:
Direct evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Internal Medicine,
[ea21] Silvana Secinaro et al. The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare:
a structured literature review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision
Making 21, 2021.
[ea22a] Helen Dargahi et al. Anchoring errors in emergency medicine residents
and faculties. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2022.
[ea22b] Kwaku Kyere et al. Availability bias and the covid-19 pandemic: A
case study of legionella pneumonia. Cureus, 2022.
[KT73] Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. On the psychology od predic-
tion. Psychological Review, 1973.
[LB11] David Levine and Alan Bleakley. Misdiagnosis: Analysis based on case
record review with proposals aimed to improve diagnostic processes.
Clinical Medicine, 2011.
[Ly21] Dan P. Ly. The influence of the availability heuristic on physicians in
the emergency department. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2021.
[RB92] Ilana Ritov and Jonathan Baron. Status-quo and omission biases.
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992.
[RH21] Rita W. Rehana and Najia Huda. A common heuristic in medicine:
Anchoring. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, 2021.
[SZ88] William Samuelson and Richard Zeckhauser. Status quo bias in deci-
sion making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1988.
[TK74] Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman. Judgment under uncertainty:
Heuristics and biases. Judgment under Uncertainty, 1974.
Downloads
Posted
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rajeev Krishnamurthy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright holder for this article has granted JSR.org a license to display the article in perpetuity.
