Rethinking Samurai Mobilisation in the Meiji Restoration

Authors

  • Mark Wu Hong Kong International School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v14i1.8917

Keywords:

Meiji Restoration

Abstract

The combined forces of Choshu, Tosa, and Satsuma overthrew the Tokugawa Shogunate in the late 1868s, dismantling the political order that had existed for over two centuries. Many scholars have come to a consensus that the Meiji Restoration was spearheaded by magnate lords and the aristocratic samurai class. As a result, the Meiji restoration has been characterized as an aristocratic revolution, while contemporary European revolutions and uprisings of the 19th century have been characterised as being the product of popular mass mobilisation. 

However, this article argues that this existing view fails to appreciate the significance of a novel form of political mobilisation in late 19th century Japan. Namely, that young samurai of marginal elite status increasingly organised and became involved in national politics. This revised analysis of how the Meiji Restoration was carried out suggests this process of samurai mobilisation began before Perry arrived through the Tokugawa ‘Promotion of Talent’, was accelerated by his arrival, and facilitated the wave of Shishi political violence noted by many historians in the early 1860s. Moreover, far from being inconsequential, this Shishi activism not only badly shook Tokugawa authority, but also enabled the coordination between the different groups which ultimately provided the necessary forces to overthrow the Tokugawa regime. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References or Bibliography

References

Zamora, M. D. (1979). Ellen Kay Trimberger. Revolution from Above: Military Bureaucrats and Development in Japan, Turkey, Egypt, and Peru. Pp. viii, 196. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1978. $14.95. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 441(1), 201-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271627944100119

McClain JL. Native Sources of Japanese Industrialization, 1750–1920. By Thomas C. Smith. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1988. x, 278 pp. The Journal of Asian Studies. 1989;48(4):877-878. doi:10.2307/2058179

Cohen, Mark (2014). The political process of the revolutionary samurai: a comparative reconsideration of Japan’s Meiji Restoration. Theory and Society 43 (2):139-168.

Fletcher, M. (1983). [Review of Conflict in Modern Japanese History: The Neglected Tradition., by T. Najita & J. V. Koschmann]. Monumenta Nipponica, 38(3), 346–349. https://doi.org/10.2307/2384895

Yu, A. C. (2024). The Ikuno Incident - Japanese Wiki Corpus. Retrieved December 1, 2024, from Japanesewiki.com website: https://www.japanesewiki.com/history/The%20Ikuno%20Incident.html

Van. (2015). Illuminating the Meiji Restoration: Nation-state and proto-nationalism in Late Edo Japan. Studenttheses.uu.nl. https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/21091

KOSCHMANN, J. V. (1987). The Mito Ideology: Discourse, Reform, and Insurrection in Late Tokugawa Japan, 1790-1864 (1st ed.). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.2430590

JANSEN, M. B. (1961). Sakamato Ryoma and the Meiji Restoration. Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt183pjs4

Craig A. The Restoration Movement in Chōshū. The Journal of Asian Studies. 1959;18(2):187-197. doi:10.2307/2941681

Published

02-28-2025

How to Cite

Wu, M. (2025). Rethinking Samurai Mobilisation in the Meiji Restoration. Journal of Student Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v14i1.8917

Issue

Section

HS Review Projects