The Ethical Considerations of Brain-Computer Interfaces
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v14i1.8906Keywords:
Brain-Computer Interfaces, BCI, EthicsAbstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) were developed in the late 20th century as computer systems that use inputs from brain signals to command a device in the user’s external environment. BCI technology may have a powerful impact on the lives of individuals with disabilities that inhibit their movement or communication; users have the opportunity to interact with their physical environment and community through these assistive devices. However, as BCIs emerge as revolutionary tools in biotechnology, they raise an onslaught of ethical considerations. This paper addresses the potential benefits and harms of BCI using the work of Immanuel Kant and Francis Fukuyama as primary guiding philosophical theories. This paper analyzes how BCIs can restore personhood and autonomy in those with disabilities that hinder their connection to their bodies. Simultaneously, this paper discusses how BCIs may undermine personhood and autonomy if enhancing the user’s capabilities past natural human function. This paper analyzes how BCIs used for enhancement purposes may affect perceptions of legal and moral responsibility, boundaries on normality, and the foundations of human nature and dignity. This paper argues that while BCIs have the therapeutic potential to bring those with disabilities closer in touch with their humanity, they threaten to undermine the human rights and dignity essential to a functioning society if used extensively for enhancement.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Shih, Jerry J., et al. "Brain-Computer Interfaces in Medicine." National Library
of Medicine, PubMed Central, Mar. 2012, 10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.12.008. Accessed 9 Aug. 2024.
Burwell, Sasha, et al. "Ethical aspects of Brain Computer Interfaces." BMC Medical Ethics, 9 Nov. 2017, bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-017-0220-y. Accessed 24 July 2024.
Gilbert, Frederic. "How I Became Myself after Merging with a Computer: Does Human-Machine Symbiosis Raise Human Rights Issues?" Brain Stimulation, vol. 16, no. 3, 1 May 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2023.04.016. Accessed 26 July 2024.
Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 8th ed., Oxford UP.
Klein, Eran, et al. "Engineering the Brain: Ethical Issues and the Introduction of Neural Devices." The Hastings Center Report, vol. 45, no. 6, Dec. 2015, pp. 26-35. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/44159152. Accessed 23 July 2024.
Hindriks, Frank, and Igor Douven. "Nozick's Experience Machine: An Empirical Study." Philosophical Psychology, vol. 31, no. 2, 2018, www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09515089.2017.1406600. Accessed 14 July 2024.
Cyberneuroethics.” Cyborg Mind: What Brain–Computer and Mind–Cyberspace Interfaces Mean for Cyberneuroethics, edited by Calum MacKellar, Berghahn Books, 2019. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvvb7mw5.9. Accessed 24 July 2024.
Chavannes, Esther. "Responsibility and Accountability." Towards Responsible Autonomy: The Ethics of Robotic and Autonomous Systems in a Military Context, Hague Centre for Strategic Studies, 2019, pp. 51-62. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/resrep19559.8. Accessed 8 Aug. 2024.
Klein, Eran, et al. "Engineering the Brain: Ethical Issues and the Introduction of Neural Devices." The Hastings Center Report, vol. 45, no. 6, Dec. 2015, pp. 26-35. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/44159152. Accessed 23 July 2024.
Livanis, Efstratios. "Understanding the Ethical Issues of Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs): A Blessing or the Beginning of a Dystopian Future?" Cureus, 14 Apr. 2024,
Fukuyama, Francis. Our Posthuman Future. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2002.
President's Council on Bioethics. Human Dignity and Bioethics:Essays Commissioned by the President's Council on Bioethics. 2008, bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/human_dignity/. Accessed 9 Aug. 2024.
Chandrasekaran, Santosh, et al. “Historical perspectives, challenges, and future directions of implantable brain-computer interfaces for sensorimotor applications.” Bioelectronic Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, 22 Sept. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s42234-021-00076-6.
Kawala-Sterniuk, Aleksandra, et al. “Summary of over fifty years with brain-computer interfaces—a review.” Brain Sciences, vol. 11, no. 1, 3 Jan. 2021, p. 43, https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010043.
Khan, Shujhat. “Transcending the Brain: Is There a Cost to Hacking the Nervous System?” Brain Communications, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 2019, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32954260/.
Hindriks, Frank, and Igor Douven. A graph demonstrating the number of participants in Hindricks and Douven’s experiment open to using the experience machine, experience pill, and functioning pill. . 2017. Taylor and Francis Online, https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2017.1406600. Accessed 2024.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Ondine Goedhuis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.


