Street Art for Urban Regeneration: Cultivating Community Identity, Social Cohesion & Economic Growth

Authors

  • Minjae Kang Bergen County Technical School teterboro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v14i1.8860

Keywords:

Urban Development, Street Art, Urban Planning, Social Cohesion

Abstract

Urban development is developing a community's cultural, economic, and physical aspects.  Urban development can often deal with challenges such as neglect in specific regions, financial constraints, cultural identity tensions, and limited community engagement. This study examines how street art is a transformative tool for addressing these issues, exploring its historical evolution, theoretical frameworks, and impacts on urban spaces and communities. Tracing street art's roots from graffiti to its current role in urban regeneration, the study analyzes key case studies, including the Berlin Wall, Rotterdam’s public art initiatives, and Naples’ urban renewal efforts. These examples highlight street art’s potential to reflect community identity, foster social cohesion, and catalyze economic growth. The study reveals that street art fosters community engagement by encouraging collaboration, dialogue, and inclusivity. It strengthens cultural identity by enabling residents to connect with their environment, promoting pride and place attachment. Furthermore, street art contributes to economic revitalization by enhancing tourism, boosting property values, and stimulating local businesses. From these theoretical insights and empirical data from past case studies, one can observe that street art plays a multifaceted role in sustainable urban development by encouraging the expression of the people in the community and building an identity around it. Policy and strategic planning are crucial for maximizing street art benefits. The paper explores the efficacy of policies such as the OrMe project and Philadelphia’s mural projects to show the increase in community satisfaction through street art. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References or Bibliography

Boffi, M., Rainisio, N., & Inghilleri, P. (2023b). Nurturing Cultural Heritages and Place Attachment through Street Art—A Longitudinal Psycho-Social Analysis of a Neighborhood Renewal Process. Sustainability, 15(13), 10437. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310437

Forte, F., & De Paola, P. (2019). How can street art have economic value? Sustainability, 11(3), 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030580

Prawata, A. (2024). Public art as generator for creating the desirable city. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 1324(1), 012030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1324/1/012030

Kolçak, E., & Kaya, N. (2022). Creating spaces for art: Long term impacts of street art in the urban context. A/Z ITU Journal of Faculty of Architecture. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2022.16768

Balarezo, M. L. G., & Karimi, K. (2017). Urban Art and place. Spatial patterns of urban art and their contribution to urban regeneration. Proceedings 24th ISUF 2017 - City and Territory in the Globalization Age. https://doi.org/10.4995/isuf2017.2017.6069

McMahon, R. (2006). The role of public art and artist collaboration in urban regeneration spaces: Dissertation Submitted for the Degree of MA (Hons) in Landscape Architecture.

Nance, K. (2021). Art as a means of urban revitalization? An examination of creative placemaking, artist perspective, gentrification, and neighborhood change in Wichita, Kansas. https://soar.wichita.edu/handle/10057/21600

Bublitz, M. G., Rank-Christman, T., Cian, L., Cortada, X., Madzharov, A., Patrick, V. M., Peracchio, L. A., Scott, M. L., Sundar, A., To, N., & Townsend, C. (2019). Collaborative Art: A Transformational Force within Communities. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 4(4), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1086/705023

Teoh, G. P. L. (2017). Participatory art as driving force for urban regeneration in Bandar Penggaram. http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/78575/

Thomas, E., Pate, S., & Ranson, A. (2014). The Crosstown Initiative: Art, Community, and Placemaking in Memphis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 55(1–2), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9691-x

Januchta-Szostak, A. (2010). The role of public visual art in urban space recognition. In InTech eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5772/7120

Januchta-Szostak, A. (2007). METHODOLOGY OF VISUAL ART LOCALIZATION IN PUBLIC SPACES ON EXAMPLE OF POZNAN CITY. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 31(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.3846/13921630.2007.10697086

He, H., Wu, M., & Gyergyak, J. (2021). Intervention and renewal − Interpretation of installation art in urban public space. Pollack Periodica, 16(3), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1556/606.2021.00362

Copy to clipboard

The role of public art in public spaces, viewed as a catalyst for urban regeneration - Student Theses Faculty Spatial Sciences. (n.d.). https://frw.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/3593/

Pogrmić, Z. (2023). CONTEMPORARY URBAN IDENTITY THROUGH STREET ART – THE EXAMPLE OF NOVI SAD. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370425856_CONTEMPORARY_URBAN_IDENTITY_THROUGH_STREET_ART_-_THE_EXAMPLE_OF_NOVI_SAD

Jones, P. (2024, September 3). The Art on the Berlin Wall: Sentiments of East and West Berlin.

TheCollector. https://www.thecollector.com/art-on-the-berlin-wall/

Published

02-28-2025

How to Cite

Kang, M. (2025). Street Art for Urban Regeneration: Cultivating Community Identity, Social Cohesion & Economic Growth. Journal of Student Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v14i1.8860

Issue

Section

HS Review Articles