Comparative Study of Eastern and Western Psychology
A Focus on Yulgok Yi I’s Theory of Mind and Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v14i1.8850Keywords:
Neo-Confucianism, Virtue Ethics, Moral Psychology, Ethical Philosophy, Cross-Cultural Analysis, Modern Ethical FrameworksAbstract
This study provides a comparative analysis of Eastern and Western approaches to moral psychology, focusing Yulgok Yi I's Neo-Confucian theory of mind and Aristotle's virtue ethics. Yulgok Yi I, a pivotal Neo-Confucian philosopher, underscored the inherent goodness of human nature (Seong) and its harmonious interaction with emotions (Jeong), enabled by the relationship between Li (principle) and Qi (vital energy). He promoted moral development through "Gyeong" (reverence) to synchronize emotional reactions with ethical standards, so enhancing personal virtue and societal peace. Conversely, Aristotle articulated human morality through his notion of eudaimonia, attained by the development of qualities such as courage and temperance, directed by the "Golden Mean"—a equilibrium between extremes.
Both philosophers emphasized the importance of combining reason and emotion in ethical conduct and stressed the practical implementation of moral development in everyday life. Yulgok emphasized community peace and self-cultivation, whereas Aristotle focused on individual flourishing through rational discernment and habitual practice. The study examines their collective perspectives on the interaction of reason, emotion, and moral development, while juxtaposing their cultural orientations and approaches.
This research reinterprets the ideas of Yulgok and Aristotle within a modern setting, so connecting Eastern and Western ethical frameworks and providing innovative insights into human morality and self-improvement. The findings enhance the debate in moral psychology and ethical philosophy, offering practical ideas for tackling contemporary societal issues through a synthesis of historical knowledge.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Aristotle. (2004). Nicomachean Ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). The Internet Classics Archive. (Original work published 350 B.C.)
Brown, T., & Lee, H. (2021). Ethics and psychology in cultural traditions: Bridging Eastern and Western perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Choi, J. (2017). Moral cultivation in Neo-Confucianism: Yulgok Yi I's theory of mind. Philosophy East and West, 67(4), 123-135.
Choi, J. (2018). Emotion and nature in Yulgok Yi I's Neo-Confucianism: The interplay of Li and Qi. Asian Philosophy, 28(2), 145-160.
Cooper, J. M. (1998). Aristotle's conception of practical wisdom and moral virtue. Princeton University Press.
Kim, S. (2020). Yulgok Yi I’s philosophy of Li and Qi: A Neo-Confucian framework for moral practice. Journal of East Asian Philosophy, 15(3), 78-95.
Lee, H. (2020). Ethical frameworks in Eastern philosophies: Yulgok Yi I and the role of moral cultivation. Routledge.
MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). University of Notre Dame Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge University Press.
Park, J. (2015). Yulgok Yi I’s Li-Qi dynamics and their application to moral behavior. Korean Philosophy Review, 52(2), 234-257.
Reeve, C. D. C. (2002). Practices of reason: Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Smith, R., & Kim, J. (2018). Cross-cultural perspectives on ethical reasoning and development. Springer.
Yi, I. (2016). Collected works of Yulgok Yi I: A Neo-Confucian perspective. Seoul National University Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Seo Yun Lee
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
