Transforming Implantology
The Role of 3D-Printed Guides in Advancing Standards of Care (2017-2024)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v14i1.8818Keywords:
surgical implant guides, standard of care, accuracy, surgical complications, pre-operative planning, devitationAbstract
This study focuses on the effects of 3D-printed surgical guides on the accuracy and reduction of errors among novice surgeons in maxillofacial surgery. The effectiveness of these guides in practical surgical settings was evaluated through an action research and field research design with a descriptive content analysis of a compilation of qualitative data and interviews. The results demonstrate a notable reduction in surgical errors, enhancement in surgical outcomes, shortening operating time, and an educational benefit for novice surgeons. The results indicate that 3D-printed guides are effective in improving surgical precision and may reduce malpractice insurance costs. This study emphasizes the capability of personalized medical devices to enhance outcomes for both patients and practitioners.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Al Yafi, F., Camenisch, B., & Al-Sabbagh, M. (2019). Is digital guided implant surgery accurate and reliable? Dental Clinics, 63(3), 381–397.
Ansmann, L., & Pfaff, H. (2017). Providers and Patients Caught Between Standardization and Individualization: Individualized Standardization as a Solution Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare". International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7(4), 349–352. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.95
Dioguardi, M., Spirito, F., Quarta, C., Sovereto, D., Basile, E., Ballini, A., Caloro, G. A., Troiano, G., Lo Muzio, L., & Mastrangelo, F. (2023). Guided dental implant surgery: systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(4), 1490.
Gavilanes, M. (n.d.). Interview with Puerto Rican Maxillofacial Surgeon. Personal.
Hama, D. R., & Mahmood, B. J. (2023). Comparison of accuracy between free-hand and surgical guide implant placement among experienced and non-experienced dental implant practitioners: an in vitro study. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 53(5), 388. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2204700235
Henprasert, P., Dawson, D. V., El-Kerdani, T., Song, X., Couso-Queiruga, E., & Holloway, J. A. (2020). Comparison of the accuracy of implant position using surgical guides fabricated by additive and subtractive techniques. Journal of Prosthodontics. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13161
Kim, J.-Y., Lee, Y.-C., Kim, S.-G., & Garagiola, U. (2023). Advancements in oral maxillofacial surgery: a comprehensive review on 3D printing and virtual surgical planning. Applied Sciences, 13(17), 9907.
Langridge, B., Momin, S., Coumbe, B., Woin, E., Griffin, M., & Butler, P. (2018). Systematic Review of the Use of 3-Dimensional Printing in Surgical Teaching and Assessment. Journal of Surgical Education, 75(1), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.06.033
Pugliese, L., Marconi, S., Negrello, E., Mauri, V., Peri, A., Gallo, V., Auricchio, F., & Pietrabissa, A. (2018). The clinical use of 3D printing in surgery. Updates in Surgery, 70(3), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0586-5
Shi, Y., Wang, J., Ma, C., Shen, J., Dong, X., & Lin, D. (2023). A systematic review of the accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implantation. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00507-w
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Mia Gavilanes; Johnny Lopez-Figueroa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
