The Effects of DEI Initiatives as a Financial Strategy in the Workplace
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v14i1.8779Keywords:
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, DEI, Corporations, Reverse Discrimination, Diversity Fatigue, Inclusive EconomicsAbstract
Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives aim to address gender, age, and racial disparities in corporate environments. This paper reviews the impact of DEI programs in creating a workplace that fosters productivity and inclusivity. The paper also discusses DEI programs being ineffective in reducing implicit bias as research shows that the effects of these programs fade within 24 hours, mainly because they are tailored to enhance the company’s overall image rather than lasting solutions for reducing discrimination. Reverse discrimination is also underlined as a rising concern, for individuals may feel as if they are undeserving of a particular position due to the emphasis on diversity. Furthermore, factors for measuring programs’ success are derived from the economic outcomes, employee sentiments, and public response. Although current research may have limitations on measuring success and corporate differences in implementing DEI programs, DEI has undoubtedly shown no overall improvement in the economic market. This study emphasizes the level of inclusion that employees feel in relation to the rushed, checkbox-driven initiatives. As a solution for the surface-level goals formulated from DEI programs, Inclusive Economics (IE) may play a role in enhancing the DEI factor in the workplace. IE differs from that of DEI by having a tangible success measurement scale and incorporates employees’ responses in today’s workplace. Conclusively, understanding the effectiveness of DEI programs and altering it accordingly is crucial for establishing an inclusive workplace in a globalized world.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
References
April 28-May 12, 2023 Poll of Black Americans.. (2023). Washington Post; Ipsos. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1u86k-IR9HoQatX-OVAc4VnhOnayfUuswTKYgSWc81E0/edit?gid=2006136987#gid=2006136987
April, K. (2022). The New Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Realities and Changes. Academia.Edu, 119–227. HR: The New Agenda. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/75365705/BOOK_CHAPTER_The_New_DEI_Realities_and_Challenges_Kurt_April_2022-libre.pdf?1638192979=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DThe_New_Diversity_Equity_and_Inclusion_D.pdf&Expires=1728403575&Signature=PgUlhHP71zoREMjwjtjYjiBUnYtIH-LZrSYn4M2zBBTEdomYfAvM9ldlurjvjizkijUjVx4sTJ2iFrRhV8hDAVpwlrTJNxYU1Yhqpm2627Nu3wfkx9vCycrZ1b9MdnbhYmr-yEgAxp0ddsPifPBQQSL7kWfFb0ow8zAfF2h1ECixt7KiVOKn4veZnDQWh2bMaPhP9ozuLdISDAUXqJrJOQDZNltxupevBeAZH3NzY7QZBiXuy015AmE0AzU3gnnk5rv8K80OLPS2vGMP05mo3EOOSA5Gds163NimJaAITiP4ghBDGgDW3fD50YdH3ehmxbO8a2nWlAXtKJtWJD8zqw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA
Balayn, A., Yang, J., Yurrita, M., & Gadiraju, U. (2023). “Fairness Toolkits, A Checkbox Culture?” On the Factors that Fragment Developer Practices in Handling Algorithmic Harms. Association for Computing Machinery, 482–495. Google Scholar. https://doi.org/10.1145/3600211.3604674
Caprino, K. (2023, February 23). Why So Many DEI Programs Are Failing And How To Improve Them. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kathycaprino/2023/02/23/why-so-many-dei-programs-are-failing-and-how-to-improve-them/
Corrado, G., & Corrado, L. (2017). Inclusive finance for inclusive growth and development. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 24, 19–23. ScienceDirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.013
Diversity. (2000). American Libraries, 31(1), 1–12. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25637470
Dixon-Fyle, S., Hunt, V., Dolan, K., & Prince., S. (2020). Diversity wins: how inclusion matters. In McKinsey & Company (pp. 3–52). https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Featured%20Insights/Diversity%20and%20Inclusion/Diversity%20wins%20How%20inclusion%20matters/Diversity-wins-How-inclusion-matters-vF.pdf
Fabella, R. V. (2017, February 5). Groups, Norms and Endogenous Membership: Towards a Socially Inclusive Economics. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/31248435/Groups_Norms_and_Endogenous_Membership_Towards_a_Socially_Inclusive_Economics
Farmanesh, P., Vehbi, A., Zargar, P., Sousan, A., & Bhatti, F. (2020). Is there Always a Positive Relationship Between Workplace Diversity and Organizational Performance, or Does Diversity Fatigue Imply a Suppressing Effect? South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 15(1), 14–26. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.2478/jeb-2020-0002
FitzGerald, C., & Hurst, S. (2017). Implicit Bias in Healthcare Professionals: a Systematic Review. BMC Medical Ethics, 18(1). Google Scholar. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8
Green, J., & Hand, J. (n.d.). McKinsey’s Diversity Matters/ Delivers/Wins Results Revisited. In Econ Journal Watch (pp. 5–34). S&P Global Market Intelligence. Retrieved October 27, 2024, from https://econjwatch.org/File+download/1296/GreenHandMar2024.pdf?mimetype=pdf.
Ipsos Black Americans Topline. (2023). In Washington Post (pp. 1–11). Ipsos. https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2023-06/Washington%20Post%20Ipsos%20Black%20Americans%20Topline_0.pdf
Kim, I., & McNeil, B. (2023). Stock price implications of DEI initiatives when liberties of vulnerable groups are politically undermined—Evidence from veterans and LGBT groups. Journal of Business Research, 166, 114146–114146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114146.
Lai, C., Skinner, A., Cooley, E., & Murrar, S. (n.d.). APA PsycNet. Psycnet.apa.org. Retrieved October 27, 2024, from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-29854-001.
Madva, A. (2020). Implicit Bias. Ethics in Practice: An Anthology, 5th Edition.
Minkin, R. (2023, May 17). Diversity, equity and inclusion in the workplace. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/05/17/diversity-equity-and-inclusion-in-the-workplace/
Myers Jr., S. (2011). The Economics of Diversity: The Efficiency vs. Equity Trade-Off. Nova Science Publishers, 48–61. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Samuel-Jr/publication/286345026_The_economics_of_diversity_The_efficiency_vs_equity_trade-off/links/5dc190a4a6fdcc21280820a6/The-economics-of-diversity-The-efficiency-vs-equity-trade-off.pdf.
Niekerk, A. V. (2019). A conceptual framework for inclusive economics. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences; AOSIS. https://www.academia.edu/87013189/A_conceptual_framework_for_inclusive_economics
Onyeador, I. N., Hudson, S. T. J., & Lewis, N. A. (2021). Moving Beyond Implicit Bias Training: Policy Insights for Increasing Organizational Diversity. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732220983840.
Pouw, N., & Gupta, J. (2017). Inclusive development: a multi-disciplinary approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 24, 104–108. ScienceDirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.013
Raduazo, L. (2021). The Effect of Gender-Diversity Training on Perceived The Effect of Gender-Diversity Training on Perceived Organizational Justice Organizational Justice. In Scholarworks (pp. 1–160). Walden Disserations and Doctoral Studies Collection. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=11806&context=dissertations
Roy, K. (2023, January 31). Opinion | Implicit bias training doesn’t work. Here’s what does. Msnbc.com. https://www.msnbc.com/know-your-value/business-culture/implicit-bias-training-doesn-t-work-here-s-what-does-n1302608
Varouchas, E. G., Arvanitis, S., Agiomirgianakis, G., & Sfakianakis, G. (2023). Board Gender Diversity and Financial Performance of US Banks: Evidence from Quantile Regression. Theoretical Economics Letters, 13(07), 1737–1756. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2023.137100.
Jolien Voorspoels. (2018). “In our department there is absolutely no discrimination of women or others.” Staff Attitudes on Gender Quotas in a Belgian University. DiGeSt. Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies, 5(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.11116/digest.5.1.3
Waynick, R. (2023). DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusivity) Leadership Initiatives for Inclusion of a Remote Workforce. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 5(4), 822–832. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.597.
WebMD. (2022). Why Your Program May Be Failing Your Employees: A Survey From WebMD Health Services. WebMD, 1–10. WebMD Health Services. https://info.webmdhealthservices.com/rs/503-BMI-508/images/DEIB_Research_Whitepaper_Final.pdf
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Soeun Lee; Lauren Malanka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
