An Analysis of Effective Secondary STEM Learning and Teaching Methods that Encourage Student Participation and Success in Secondary School and Beyond
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v14i1.8736Keywords:
STEM, Learning, Teaching, Secondary EducationAbstract
Student participation and success in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) subjects at secondary school and college are critical to the advancement and growth of STEM-based industries and organizations that are vitally important to the economy of the United States. This study explored the prevalent interest level and attitudes among high school students at the local school district towards STEM subjects such as the Sciences and Mathematics, and conducted a digital survey on study methods that high school students employ to support their success in these STEM subjects. The survey also gathered insights from the students about obstacles in their path to success in STEM subjects and about changes and improvements that will help them succeed. This study included in-person interviews of the district’s middle and high school Science and Mathematics teachers regarding their instruction methods, student engagement, and their ability to provide different perspectives to students through their teaching methodologies. While this study does not offer a comprehensive conclusion of effective STEM teaching and learning methods due to limitations in collecting data about actual student performance and grade trends, it presents useful insights about effective steps that both students and teachers can take to improve the students’ understanding of complex STEM topics and help them succeed in future STEM pathways in high school and beyond.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Barone, Ryan. "The state of STEM education told through 26 stats." iDTech, 20 Jan. 2023, www.idtech.com/blog/stem-education-statistics. Accessed 31 Oct. 2023.
Crawley, F. E., & Black, C. B. (1992). Causal modeling of secondary science students' intentions to enroll in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 585–599.
Furner, J. M., & Kumar, D. D. (2007). The Mathematics and Science Integration Argument: A Stand for Teacher Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(3), 185-. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75397
Hedges, H., Cullen, J., & Jordan, B. (2011). Early years curriculum: Funds of knowledge as a conceptual framework for children’s interests. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2010.511275
"Here's why kids fall behind in science." The Conversation, 11 Apr. 2016, theconversation.com/heres-why-kids-fall-behind-in-science-56785. Accessed 16 Sept. 2023.
Hsu, P.-S., Lee, E. M., Ginting, S., Smith, T. J., & Kraft, C. (2019). A Case Study Exploring Non-dominant Youths' Attitudes Toward Science Through Making and Scientific Argumentation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(Suppl 1), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09997-w
Leedy, Paul D., and Jeanne Ellis Ormrod. Practical Research: Planning and Design. 12th ed., 2019.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). Science Performance. Condition of Education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved [09/08/2023], from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cne.
Ragusa, G., Shaobo Huang, & Levonisova, S. V. (2022). Improving Middle School Science Achievement, Literacy and Motivation: A Longitudinal Study of a Teacher Professional Development Program. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 23(4), 49–62.
Schunn, C. D., Newcombe, N. S., Alfieri, L., Cromley, J. G., Massey, C., & Merlino, J. F. (2018). Using principles of cognitive science to improve science learning in middle school: What works when and for whom? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3398
Stoeger, H., Debatin, T., Heilemann, M., Schirner, S., & Ziegler, A. (2023). Online mentoring for girls in secondary education to increase participation rates of women in STEM: A long‐term follow‐up study on later university major and career choices. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1523(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14989
Tyler-Wood, T., Ellison, A., Lim, O., & Periathiruvadi, S. (2012). Bringing Up Girls in Science (BUGS): The Effectiveness of an Afterschool Environmental Science Program for Increasing Female Students' Interest in Science Careers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9279-2
Yoder, Steven. "Middle school science teachers often have shaky scientific knowledge." The Hechinger Report, 15 Apr. 2022, hechingerreport.org/minimal-qualifications-for-middle-school-science-teachers-allow-misinformation-to-creep-into-classrooms/. Accessed 12 Sept. 2023.
Young, D. J., & Fraser, B. J. (1994). Gender differences in science achievement: Do school effects make a difference? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(8), 857–871. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310808
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Anjali Gopal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
