A Review on the Effectiveness of the Wyss Institute's Autonomous Flying Robots for Pollination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v14i1.8534Keywords:
Robotic bees, Robobees, Pollination Technology, Artificial Pollination, Hive declineAbstract
With the alarming global bee population decline threatening agricultural ecosystems and food production, innovative solutions like robotic bees have gained attention as potential pollination substitutes. This report assesses the effectiveness of robotic bees for pollination through a literature review. Robotic bees are bug-sized autonomous flying robots in development by the Wyss Institute which are claimed to have agricultural pollination applications. Research shows that these “robobees” will likely not be a viable solution to the pollination crisis as there are significant downsides including the technology's substantial costs and environmental risks. Recommendations for addressing these challenges include the use of a computer-vision algorithm to help with navigation and a geo-fencing system to prevent unwanted wandering. Alternatives such as habitat restoration, simple artificial pollination, and conventional beekeeping, although not without their flaws, may serve as better solutions to the crisis. Despite this, engineers have been improving these micro-robots by enhancing their flight and processing capabilities and they may have species-specific pollination applications in the future.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Dennis vanEngelsdorp and Marina Doris Meixner. A historical review of managed honey bee populations in europe and the united states and the factors that may affect them. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 103:S80–S95, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2009.06.011
Mark JF Brown and Robert J Paxton. The conservation of bees: a global perspective. Apidologie, 40(3):410–416, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido/2009019
Jafferis. Vallejo-Marin, M. Scientists building the buzz with robot bees to simulate pollination. SABI Magazine-Tydskrif, 14(4):7, 2022. https://www.stir.ac.uk/news/2022/april-2022-news/building-a-buzz-robot-bees-to-simulate-pollination/
R. B. Thapa. Honeybees and other insect pollinators of cultivated plants: a review. J. Inst. Agric. Anim. Sci, 27:1–23, 2006. https://doi.org/10.3126/jiaas.v27i0.691
Evans J. D. Saegerman C. Mullin C. Haubruge E. Nguyen B. K. ... Pettis J. S. VanEngelsdorp, D. Colony collapse disorder: a descriptive study. PloS one, 4(8), 2009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006481
Vaissi`ere B. E. Cane J. H. Steffan-Dewenter I. Cunningham S. A. Kremen C. Tscharntke T. Klein, A. M. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the royal society B: biological sciences, 274(1608):303–313, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3721
Hanan J. Dorin A. Gleadow, R. Averting robo-bees: why free-flying robotic bees are
a bad idea. Emerging Topics in Life Sciences, 3(6):723–729, 2019. http://doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20190063
Nagpal R. Wei G. Y. Wood, R. Flight of the robobees. Scientific American, 308(3):60–65, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0313-60
Robobees: Autonomous flying microrobots. Wyss Institute, 2023. https://wyss.harvard.edu/technology/robobees-autonomous-flying-microrobots/
Chirarattananon P. Fuller S. B. Jafferis N. T. Ma K. Y. Spenko M. ... Wood R. J. Graule, M. A. Perching and takeoff of a robotic insect on overhangs using switchable electrostatic adhesion. Science, 352(6288):978–982, 2016.
http://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf1092
E. F. Helbling N. T. Jafferis R. Zufferey A. Ong K. Ma N. Gravish P. Chirarattananon M. Kovac R. J. Wood Y. Chen, H. Wang. A biologically inspired, flapping-wing, hybrid aerial-aquatic microrobot. Sci. Robot., 2(eaao5619), 2017. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aao5619
Breuer Kenny. Flight of the robobee. Nature, 570:448–449, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01964-3
Keng-Lou James Hung, Jennifer M Kingston, Matthias Albrecht, David A Holway, and Joshua R Kohn. The worldwide importance of honey bees as pollinators in natural habitats. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1870):20172140, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2140
Simon G Potts, Peter Neumann, Bernard Vaissi`ere, and Nicolas J Vereecken. Robotic bees for crop pollination: Why drones cannot replace biodiversity. Science of the total environment, 642:665–667, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.114
Tonghui Zhao, Wei Fang, Yangyang Fan, Zhiming Hu, Han Wu, Xi-Qiao Feng, and Jiu-an Lv. Phototactic miniature soft robots with terrain adaptability. Advanced Materials Technologies, 7(9):2101660, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202101660
M Khurrum S Bhutta, Adnan Omar, and Xiaozhe Yang. Electronic waste: a growing concern in today’s environment. Economics Research International, 2011, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/474230
Tim Landgraf. RoboBee: a biomimetic honeybee robot for the analysis of the dance communication system. PhD thesis, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2010.5650930
Caroline Williams. Summon the bee bots: can flying robots save our crops? New Scientist, 220(2943):42–45, 2013. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22029430-600-summon-the-bee-bots-can-flying-robots-save-our-crops/
Partha Pratim Ray. A review on tinyml: State-of-the-art and prospects. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 34(4):1595–1623, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.11.019
V Suganya. Usage and perception of geofencing. EPRA International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies (EBMS), 9(2):1–4, 2022. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra9463
Sawyer B Fuller, Alexander Sands, Andreas Haggerty, Michael Karpelson, and Robert J Wood. Estimating attitude and wind velocity using biomimetic sensors on a microrobotic bee. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 1374–1380. IEEE, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630750
Carol A Kearns, David W Inouye, and Nickolas M Waser. Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annual review of ecology and systematics, 29(1):83–112, 1998. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.83
Rachael Winfree. The conservation and restoration of wild bees. Annals of the New York academy of sciences, 1195(1):169–197, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05449.x
Melissa A Broussard, Michael Coates, and Paul Martinsen. Artificial pollination technologies: A review. Agronomy, 13(5):1351, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13051351
Joseph H Connell. Pollination of almonds: practices and problems. HortTechnology, 10(1):116–119, 2000.
Kenna E MacKenzie. Pollination requirements of three highbush blueberry(vaccinium corymbosum l.) cultivars. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 122(6):891–896, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.122.6.891
George E Bohart. Management of wild bees for the pollination of crops. Annual review of entomology, 17(1):287–312, 1972. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.17.010172.001443
Simon G Potts, Stuart PM Roberts, Robin Dean, Gay Marris, Mike A Brown, Richard Jones, Peter Neumann, and Josef Settele. Declines of managed honey bees and beekeepers in europe. Journal of apicultural research, 49(1):15–22, 2010. http://doi.org/10.3896/ibra.1.49.1.02
Anja Tehel, Mark JF Brown, and Robert J Paxton. Impact of managed honey bee viruses on wild bees. Current opinion in virology, 19:16–22, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2016.06.006
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Danny Zhang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
