Use of Generative AI among High School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v14i1.8520Keywords:
Generative AI, High School, Artificial Intelligence, International Baccalaureate, StudentsAbstract
Generative AI has seen an explosive rise in its usage since the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 (McKendrick, 2021), especially in the field of education. However, its impact in a high school setting, especially its usage amongst high school students, is an under-researched area. In this paper, we conducted exploratory qualitative research with high school students to explore how students use generative AI. Through the use of thematic analysis, we see both the positive and negative impacts of AI amongst high school students. Our findings denote that while generative AI saves time and assists in the initial brainstorming, it also encourages complacency in the learning process, especially in developing critical thinking skills among young adults. Through this paper, we identify future research directions of generative AI and the practical implications for its use among young adults.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Adams, S. K., Williford, D. N., Vaccaro, A., Kisler, T. S., Francis, A., & Newman, B. (2017). The young and the restless: Socializing trumps sleep, fear of missing out, and technological distractions in first-year college students. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22(3), 337-348.
AI adoption skyrocketed over the last 18 months. (2021, September 27). Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/09/ai-adoption-skyrocketed-over-the-last-18-months
Armstrong, P. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching, 1-3.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bochniarz, K. T., Czerwiński, S. K., Sawicki, A., & Atroszko, P. A. (2021). Attitudes to AI among high school students: Understanding distrust towards humans will not help us understand distrust towards AI. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, 111299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111299
Chen, J. J., & Lin, J. C. (2024). Artificial intelligence as a double-edged sword: Wielding the POWER principles to maximize its positive effects and minimize its negative effects. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 25(1), 146-153.
Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2022). Two decades of artificial intelligence
in education. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 28–47.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/48647028
Cooper, A., & Rodman, A. (2023). AI and medical education-a 21st-century Pandora’s box. N Engl J Med, 389(5), 385-387.
Chiu, T. K., Moorhouse, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Ismailov, M. (2023). Teacher support and student motivation to learn with Artificial Intelligence (AI) based chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-17.
Gbollie, C., & Keamu, H. P. (2016). Student Academic Performance: The Role of Motivation, Strategies, and Perceived Factors Hindering Liberian Junior and Senior High School Students Learning. Education Research International, 2017(1), 1789084. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1789084
Halaweh, M. A. S. (2023). Intelligent Information Systems: The'humanate'role of artificial intelligence in information systems. Ajman Journal of Studies & Research, 22(2).
Khan, B., Fatima, H., Qureshi, A., Kumar, S., Hanan, A., Hussain, J., & Abdullah, S. (2023). Drawbacks of Artificial Intelligence and Their Potential Solutions in the Healthcare Sector. Biomedical materials & devices (New York, N.Y.), 1–8. Advance online Irene
Lee, Safinah Ali, Helen Zhang, Daniella DiPaola, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2021. Developing Middle School Students' AI Literacy. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432513publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44174-023-00063-2
Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in Education. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299561597_Intelligence_Unleashed_An_argument_for_AI_in_Education
Park, J. (2019). Implications of AI-based grammar checker in EFL Learning and Testing: Korean High school students’ writing. The Korea English Language Testing Association, 14, 11–39.
https://doi.org/10.37244/ela.2019.14.11
Pintrich, P. R., Roeser, R. W., & de Groot, E. A. M. (1994). Classroom and Individual Differences in Early Adolescents’ Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 14(2), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/027243169401400204
Ramirez, T. V. (2016). On Pedagogy of Personality Assessment: Application of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1–7.doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1167
Sun, L., & Zhou, L. (2024). Does Generative Artificial Intelligence Improve the Academic Achievement of College Students? A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241277937
Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-Regulated Learning: The Educational Legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_3
Villarroel, V., Boud, D., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., & Bruna, C. (2019). Using principles of authentic assessment to redesign written examinations and tests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1564882
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of educational psychology, 81(3), 329.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Siya Agarwal; Vrinda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
