The Impact Caretakers Have on the Recovery Process of Stroke Survivors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i4.8187Keywords:
Stroke, Caregiver, Recovery, Adaptability, Quality of Life, Stroke Survivor, Collaborative CareAbstract
This research aims to evaluate the impact of family care on the recovery process of stroke survivors. Using a comparative, evaluative ethnography, two surveys were created (one for stroke survivors and one for caretakers/family members of stroke survivors) to investigate the quality of life of stroke survivors post-stroke. Sixty-five responses were collected from these surveys, and qualitative and quantitative data were evaluated. Analysis disclosed that most stroke survivors experience significant life changes such as identity loss, physical disabilities, and relationship decline as a result of a stroke. With these challenges perceived as prominent in a survivor's life post-stroke, it is recognized that the presence of a caretaker is beneficial. However, the study acknowledged that variation between caretakers' perception of survivors' mental health and recovery process compared to survivors' self-assessments may need further exploration. This study aligns with previous literature as it explores the positive influence of family care and digs deeper into what effects a caretaker will have. It is recognized that although caretakers positively affect recovery experiences, social connections, and more, there are no guarantees in the rehabilitation process. Future research should explore the specific correlations between survivors' and caretakers' interpretations of recovery, as well as look deeper into the long-term effects of a stroke on a survivor's identity and mental well-being. Overall, the conclusions expressed that comprehensive support systems are significant when hoping to enhance the recovery process and improve the quality of life for stroke survivors.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Anderson, S., & Whitfield, K. (2013). Social identity and stroke:‘they don't make me feel like, there's something wrong with me’. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 27(4), 820-830.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23121474/
Davoody, N., Koch, S., Krakau, I., & Hägglund, M. (2016). Post-discharge stroke patients’ information needs as input to proposing patient-centred eHealth services. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 16(1), 1-13. https://bmcmedinformdecismak.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12911-016-0307-2
Medeiros, G. C., Roy, D., Kontos, N., & Beach, S. R. (2020). Post-stroke depression: a 2020 updated review. General hospital psychiatry, 66, 70-80.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32717644/
Northcott, S., Moss, B., Harrison, K., & Hilari, K. (2016). A systematic review of the impact of stroke on social support and social networks: associated factors and patterns of change. Clinical rehabilitation, 30(8), 811-831. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26330297/
Sarre, S., Redlich, C., Tinker, A., Sadler, E., Bhalla, A., & McKevitt, C. (2014). A systematic review of qualitative studies on adjusting after stroke: lessons for the study of resilience. Disability and rehabilitation, 36(9), 716-726. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23883420/
Young, M. E., Lutz, B. J., Creasy, K. R., Cox, K. J., & Martz, C. (2014). A comprehensive assessment of family caregivers of stroke survivors during inpatient rehabilitation. Disability and rehabilitation, 36(22), 1892-1902. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24467676/
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Kennedy Smith

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.


