A Novel 3D-Printed Implant for Neuroglial Regeneration: Advancing Central Nervous System Recovery

Authors

  • Iris Fan American Heritage School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i4.7712

Keywords:

hydrogels, neuroglia, biomaterials, tissue engineering, nerve regeneration, central nervous system, brain injuries

Abstract

 

Neurological disorders, including traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), spinal cord injuries (SCIs), peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs), and neurodegenerative disorders (NDs), affect 1 in 6 individuals globally. The central nervous system (CNS) has a limited regenerative capacity following injury or disease leaving long-lasting cognitive dysfunction. The field’s current gold standard, nerve grafts, poses risks of infection, functional limitations, and substantial costs. Neuroglia, specifically astrocytes with distinct A1 and A2 categories play a crucial role in homeostasis and neurogenesis in the CNS. A1 reactive astrocytes induce neuron death while A2 reactive astrocytes promote neuron growth. This investigation aimed to enhance CNS recovery by developing a 3D-printed hydrogel-integrated scaffold. A novel scaffold was printed with polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) chemically crosslinked with a gelatin/chitosan/silk fibroin hydrogel incorporated with nerve growth factor (NGF) and chondroitinase ABC (ChABC) to stimulate nerve growth and mitigate tissue scarring. Biomaterial and biological characterization was done against the positive control, a murine nerve graft. An SEM analysis indicated a 75µm pore size and a porosity appropriate for astrocyte growth. A rheological frequency sweep found a complex modulus up to 162 Pascals. The implant absorbed water up to 92% of its dry mass and exhibited slow degradability. Cell growth increased 167% within a 3-day period with 94% cell viability. The implant also displayed a significantly lower amount of neuroinflammatory markers and axon growth of 45µm. Overall, this novel integrated implant holds promise for CNS regeneration and neural engineering applications, offering a biocompatible, functional, cost-effective alternative to current standards.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References or Bibliography

Ansaripour, A., Thompson, A., Styron, J. F., & Javanbakht, M. (2023). Cost–effectiveness analysis of Avance® allograft for the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries in the USA. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2023-0113

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023, May 4). Stroke Facts. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/stroke/facts.htm

Gallo, V., & Deneen, B. (2014). Glial Development: The Crossroads of Regeneration and Repair in the CNS. Neuron, 83(2), 283-308. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.neuron.2014.06.010

Krishani, M., Shin, W. Y., Suhaimi, H., & Sambudi, N. S. (2023). Development of Scaffolds from Bio-Based Natural Materials for Tissue Regeneration Applications: A Review. Gels, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9020100

Li, X., Tao, Y., Bradley, R., & Du, Z. (2018). Fast Generation of Functional Subtype Astrocytes from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Stem Cell Reports, 11, 998-1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.08.019

Liddelow, S. A., & Barres, B. A. (2017). Reactive Astrocytes: Production, Function, and Therapeutic Potential. Immunity, 46(6), 957-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2017.06.006

Ma, H., Peng, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., & Min, P. (2022). Effects and Progress of Photo-Crosslinking Hydrogels in Wound Healing Improvement. Gels, 8, 609-629. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fgels8100609

Ohtake, Y., Smith, G. M., & Lu, S. (2016). Reactive astrocyte scar and axon regeneration: suppressor or facilitator? Neural Regeneration Research, 11(7), 1050-1051. https://doi.org/10.4103%2F1673-5374.187022

Quan, L., Uyeda, A., & Muramatsu, R. (2022). Central nervous system regeneration: the roles of glial cells in the potential molecular mechanism underlying remyelination. Inflammation and Regeneration, 42(7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41232-022-00193-y

Smith, C. (2018). Neurotrama. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 145, 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802395-2.00008-0

Subramanian, A., Krishnan, U.M. & Sethuraman, S. Development of biomaterial scaffold for nerve tissue engineering: Biomaterial mediated neural regeneration. J Biomed Sci, 108 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1423-0127-16-108

Tian L, Prabhakaran MP, Ramakrishna S. Strategies for regeneration of components of nervous system: scaffolds, cells and biomolecules. Regen Biomater. 2015 Mar;2(1):31-45. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbu017. Epub 2015 Jan 13.

Wong, Z., Liu, H., Luo, W., Li, Z., & Yang, X. (2020). Regeneration of skeletal system with genipin crosslinked biomaterials. Technological advances in 3D tissue and organ models, 11, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2041731420974861

World Health Organization. (2007, February 27). Neurological disorders affect millions globally: WHO report. https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2007-neurological-disorders-affect-millions-globally-who-report

World Health Organization. (2013). Stroke, Cerebrovascular Accident. https://www.emro.who.int/health-topics/stroke-cerebrovascular-accident/index.html

World Health Organization. (2023, November 19). Spinal cord injury. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/spinal-cord-injury

Published

11-30-2024

How to Cite

Fan, I. (2024). A Novel 3D-Printed Implant for Neuroglial Regeneration: Advancing Central Nervous System Recovery. Journal of Student Research, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i4.7712

Issue

Section

HS Research Articles