An Investigation into the Feasibility of using MHETase and PETase for Water Treatment Due to the Increase of Microplastic Ingestion through Tap Water
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i4.7711Keywords:
microplastics, sustainabiltiy, water treatment, microplastic ingestionAbstract
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is the most abundantly produced plastic due to packaging and textiles, contributing to the widespread presence in the environment and the generation microplastics. Given microplastics high absorption rates and hydrophobicity they can accumulate toxic chemicals making them hazardous. When large quantities of microplastics infiltrate drinking water treatment facilities the public is exposed to these toxic chemicals, potentially resulting in various cancers and reproductive disorders. In response to the accumulating microplastics in the environment biochemical engineers have begun to analyze microbial solutions, such as enzymes MHETase and PETase, which can enzymically degrade PET polymers and metabolically assimilate them as a carbon nutrient source. However, it is unknown whether these enzymes can be adapted to drinking water treatment processes. To address this, an experimentation of inquiry was conducted to analyze the digestion rate of PET plastic when exposed to environments resembling those of drinking water treatment facilities. By introducing water samples collected from the Ann Arbor Drinking Water Treatment Facility and analyzing the change in phenol indicator color and mass of PET plastic samples. The research design concluded that despite the introduction of water samples there was no significant change in the digestion rate as compared to control samples, suggesting the feasibility of utilizing MHETase and PETase as a water treatment solution for PET microplastics within drinking water treatment facilities.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Austin HP, Allen MD, Donohoe BS, Rorrer NA, Kearns FL, Silveira RL, Pollard BC, Dominick G, Duman R, El Omari K, et al. Characterization and engineering of a plastic-degrading aromatic polyesterase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018;115(19). doi:10.1073/pnas.1718804115
Newton DE. Plastics and microplastics: a reference handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, an imprint of ABC-CLIO, LLC; 2021.
Cox KD, Covernton GA, Davies HL, Dower JF, Juanes F, Dudas SE. Human consumption of microplastics. Environmental Science and Technology. 2019;53(12):7068–7074. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b01517
Lee Y, Cho J, Sohn J, Kim C. Health effects of microplastic exposures: current issues and perspectives in South Korea. Yonsei Medical Journal. 2023;64(5):301. doi:10.3349/ymj.2023.0048
Barclay A, Acharya KR. Engineering plastic eating enzymes using structural biology. Biomolecules. 2023;13(9):1407. doi:10.3390/biom13091407
Nielsen TD, Hasselbalch J, Holmberg K, Stripple J. Politics and the plastic crisis: a review throughout the plastic life cycle. WIREs Energy and Environment. 2019;9(1). doi:10.1002/wene.360
Lin Y-D, Huang P-H, Chen Y-W, Hsieh C-W, Tain Y-L, Lee B-H, Hou C-Y, Shih M-K. Sources, degradation, ingestion and effects of microplastics on humans: a review. Toxics. 2023;11(9):747. doi:10.3390/toxics11090747
Gopalakrishnan KK, Sivakumar R, Kashian D. The microplastics cycle: An in-depth look at a complex topic. Applied Sciences. 2023;13(19):10999. doi:10.3390/app131910999
Mason SA. Plastics, plastics everywhere: Studies in the great lakes and beyond highlight the ubiquity of microplastics in our rivers and drinking water. American Scientist. 2019;107(5). doi: 10.1016/j.jglr.2016.05.009
Ghosh S, Sinha JK, Ghosh S, Vashisth K, Han S, Bhaskar R. Microplastics as an emerging threat to the global environment and human health. Sustainability. 2023;15(14):10821. doi:10.3390/su151410821
Arienzo M, Donadio C. Microplastic–Pharmaceuticals interaction in water systems. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2023;11(7):1437. doi:10.3390/jmse11071437
Rashed AH, Yesilay G, Hazeem L, Rashdan S, AlMealla R, Kilinc Z, Ali F, Abdulrasool F, Kamel AH. Micro- and nano-plastics contaminants in the environment: Sources, fate, toxicity, detection, remediation, and sustainable perspectives. Water. 2023;15(20):3535. doi:10.3390/w15203535
Conesa JA, Ortuño N. Reuse of water contaminated by microplastics, the effectiveness of Filtration Processes: a review. Energies. 2022;15(7):2432. doi:10.3390/en15072432
Cahill N. Testing at the source: California readies a groundbreaking hunt to check for microplastics in drinking water. Water Education Foundation. 2023 [accessed 2024 Apr 15]. https://www.watereducation.org/western-water/testing-source-california-readies-groundbreaking-hunt-check-microplastics-drinking#:~:text=Nearly%20five%20years% 20after%20the,for%20microplastics%20in%20drinking%20water.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Water treatment. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2022 May 16 [accessed 2024 Apr 2]. https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/drinking/public/water_treatment.html
Sulpizio J. Microplastics in our waters, an unquestionable concern. Penn State Extension. 2022 [accessed 2024 Apr 2]. https://extension.psu.edu/microplastics-in-our-waters-an-unquestionableconcern#:~:text=Are%20we%20consuming%20microplastics%3F,Mason%2C%20a%20Penn%20State%20researcher.
Boneta S, Arafet K, Moliner V. QM/mm study of the enzymatic biodegradation mechanism of polyethylene terephthalate. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 2021;61(6):3041–3051. doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00394
University of Wyoming, editor. Glucose broth tubes: Summary of biochemical tests: Additional info: Molb 2021: College of Agriculture and Natural Sciences. UWYO. [accessed 2024 Apr 28]. https://www.uwyo.edu/molb2021/additional_info/summ_biochem/glucose_broth.html
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Ella Peak; Rachel

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.


