Assessing AlphaFold AI’s Protease Enzyme Structure Prediction Accuracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.7703Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Protein, Protease, Enzyme, AlphaFold, Protein PredictionAbstract
This study analyzed AlphaFold AI’s ability in accurately predicting protease enzyme structures. AlphaFold uses machine learning, taking amino acid sequences and using physical and scientific knowledge of protein structures to generate a protein structure prediction. Past studies have comfirmed AlphaFold’s general abilities but have identified limitations in certain factors, like post translational modifications, ligands, and other environmental factors. However, there have not been studies assessing AlphaFold in predicting protease enzyme structures specifically. Quantitative data was collected using ex-post facto and correlational methods, which compared the RMSD score between AlphaFold and Protein Data Bank structures of the same protease enzyme. Furthermore, correlational trends were searched for between protein complexity and length with the RMSD score. 77% of the 30 protease enzymes assessed were found to be accurate, with more complex structures lowering in accuracy. Protein length was not a factor in AlphaFold’s prediction accuracy. By utilizing these findings, researchers in the pharmaceutical industry can consider the weak points of AlphaFold, conduct further studies identifying more factors that contribute to AlphaFold’s accuracy, and work on improving the program based on the results.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Bagdonas, H., Fogarty, C.A., Fadda, E. et al. The case for post-predictional modifications in the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database. Nat Struct Mol Biol 28, 869–870 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-021-00680-9
Berman, H. M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Bhat, T. N., Weissig, H., Shindyalov, I. N., & Bourne, P. E. (2000). The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic acids research, 28(1), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.235
Buttazzo G. (2023). Rise of artificial general intelligence: risks and opportunities. Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 6, 1226990. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1226990
Chakravarty D, Porter LL (2022). AlphaFold2 fails to predict protein fold switching. Protein Science. 31(6):e4353. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.4353
Castro-Alvarez, A., Costa, A. M., & Vilarrasa, J. (2017). The Performance of Several Docking Programs at Reproducing Protein-Macrolide-Like Crystal Structures. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 22(1), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22010136
Dhakal, A., McKay, C., Tanner, J. J., & Cheng, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the prediction of protein–ligand interactions: recent advances and future directions. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbab476
Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C., Meng, E. C., Pettersen, E. F., Couch, G. S., Morris, J. H., & Ferrin, T. E. (2018). UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 27(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3235
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
Kolluri, S., Lin, J., Liu, R., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, W. (2022). Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Pharmaceutical Research and Development: a Review. The AAPS Journal, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-021-00644-3
López-Otín, C., & Bond, J. S. (2008). Proteases: multifunctional enzymes in life and disease. The Journal of biological chemistry, 283(45), 30433–30437. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R800035200
Metz, C. (2022, July 28). A.I. Predicts the Shape of Nearly Every Protein Known to Science. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/28/science/ai-deepmind-proteins.html
Sahu, A., Mishra, J., & Kushwaha, N. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Drugs and Pharmaceuticals. Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening, 25. https://doi.org/10.2174/1386207325666211207153943
Shanehsazzadeh, A. (2024). Unlocking de novo antibody design with generative artificial intelligence [Review of Unlocking de novo antibody design with generative artificial intelligence]. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
Terwilliger, Thomas C et al. “AlphaFold predictions are valuable hypotheses and accelerate but do not replace experimental structure determination.” Nature methods vol. 21,1 (2024): 110-116. doi:10.1038/s41592-023-02087-4
Thornton, J.M., Laskowski, R.A. & Borkakoti, N. AlphaFold heralds a data-driven revolution in biology and medicine. Nat Med 27, 1666–1669 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01533-0
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Iris Zhang; Janet Wolfe

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.


