Evaluating Insect Experimentation: Ethical, Scientific and Regulatory Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.7501Keywords:
Cockroach, Animal Testing, Insect Testing, Utilitarianism, Nociceptive PathwayAbstract
Animal and insect testing is an essential part of experimentation in the current world. However, what goes unseen is the amount of insect testing, especially cockroaches, due to their undesirable nature. This study examines the scientific limitations of inherent animal and insect testing, reveals insights from studies about the memory and pain receptors of insects, and uncovers ethical backings of animal testing. One problem with animal testing is that there are limitations to model organisms because they are not humans and the reliability of animal testing is off. Which results in animal testing and lives in vain. In addition to this, insects, like cockroaches, have particular learning, memory and nociception pathways which reveal the elevated cognitive capabilities that insects may have. In conclusion, this paper draws attention and scrutinizes the current ethical and regulatory systems in place for insect testing. Although the utilitarian perspective weighs the benefits of medical advancements against the ethical concerns of animal/insect suffering, by embracing other potential alternatives to animal testing, modern-day research can head towards a more humane scientific practice.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Abramson, C. I., Morris, A. W., Michaluk, L. M., & Squire, J. (2004). Antistatic Foam as a Shocking Surface for Behavioral Studies with Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and American Cockroaches (Orthoptera: Blattelidae). Journal of Entomological Science, 39(4), 562–566. https://doi.org/10.18474/0749-8004-39.4.562
Adamo, S. A. (2019). Is it pain if it does not hurt? On the unlikelihood of insect pain. The Canadian Entomologist, 151(6), 685–695. doi:10.4039/tce.2019.49
Akhtar, A. (2015). The flaws and human harms of animal experimentation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics/CQ. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 24(4), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180115000079
American Psychological Association. (2018, April 19). APA Dictionary of Psychology. Dictionary.apa.org. https://dictionary.apa.org/classical-conditioning
Arican, C., Bulk, J., Deisig, N., & Nawrot, M. P. (2020). Cockroaches show individuality in learning and memory during classical and operant conditioning. Frontiers in Physiology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01539
Barraco, D. (1981). Effects of cycloheximide and puromycin on learning and retention in the cockroach, P. americana. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 15(3), 489–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(81)90282-3
Bass, R. (2012). Lives in the Balance: Utilitarianism and animal research. In The Ethics of Animal Research: Exploring the Controversy. MIT Press.
Bègue, L., & Laine, P. (2016). Moral utilitarianism and attitudes toward animals. Ethics & Behavior, 27(3), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2016.1162720
Decker, S., McConnaughey, S., & Page, T. (2007). Circadian regulation of insect olfactory learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(40), 15905-15910. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702082104
Eisemann, C. H., Jorgensen, W. K., Merritt, D. J., Rice, M. J., Cribb, B. W., Webb, P. D., & Zalucki, M. P. (1984). Do insects feel pain? — A biological view. Experientia, 40(2), 164–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01963580
Ellis, G. B. (1987a). Animal experimentation and public policy: what next? Cancer Investigation, 5(6), 627–631. https://doi.org/10.3109/07357908709020322
Elwood, R. W. (2023). Behavioural indicators of pain and suffering in arthropods and might pain bite back? Animals, 13(16), 2602. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13162602
Emanuel, S., & Libersat, F. (2019). Nociceptive Pathway in the Cockroach Periplaneta americana. Frontiers in Physiology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01100
Garren, M., Sexauer, S., & Page, T. (2013). Effect of circadian phase on memory acquisition and recall: operant conditioning vs. classical conditioning. Plos One, 8(3), e58693. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058693
Gibbons, M., & Sarlak, S. (2020). Inhibition of pain or response to injury in invertebrates and vertebrates. Animal Sentience, 5(29). https://doi.org/10.51291/2377-7478.1649
Gleichgerrcht, E. and Young, L. (2013). Low levels of empathic concern predict utilitarian moral judgment. Plos One, 8(4), e60418. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060418
Greene, J., Morelli, S., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L., & Cohen, J. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107(3), 1144-1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004
Hamanaka, Y., Minoura, R., Nishino, H., Miura, T., & Mizunami, M. (2016). Dopamine- and tyrosine hydroxylase-immunoreactive neurons in the brain of the american cockroach, periplaneta americana. Plos One, 11(8), e0160531. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160531
Hosono, S., Matsumoto, Y., & Mizunami, M. (2016). Interaction of inhibitory and facilitatory effects of conditioning trials on long-term memory formation. Learning & Memory, 23(12), 669-678. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.043513.116
HÄYRY, M. (2021). Just Better Utilitarianism. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 30(2), 343–367. doi:10.1017/S0963180120000882
Kendroud S, Fitzgerald LA, Murray IV, et al. Physiology, Nociceptive Pathways. [Updated 2022 Sep 26]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470255/
Kiani, A. K., Pheby, D., Henehan, G., Brown, R., Sieving, P., Sykora, P., Marks, R., Falsini, B., Capodicasa, N., Miertus, S., Lorusso, L., Dondossola, D., Tartaglia, G. M., Ergoren, M. C., Dundar, M., Michelini, S., Malacarne, D., Bonetti, G., Dautaj, A., . . . Bertelli, M. (2022). Ethical considerations regarding animal experimentation. HAL (Le Centre Pour La Communication Scientifique Directe), 63(2 Suppl 3), E255–E266. https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.2s3.2768
Latham, S. R. (2012). U.S. Law and Animal Experimentation:A Critical Primer. Hastings Center Report, 42(s1), S35–S39. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.107
Legendre, T. and Baker, M. (2021). The gateway bug to edible insect consumption: interactions between message framing, celebrity endorsement and online social support. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(5), 1810-1829. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-08-2020-0855
Lubinski, A. and Page, T. (2015). The optic lobes regulate circadian rhythms of olfactory learning and memory in the cockroach. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 31(2), 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730415622710
Maliszewska, J., Marcinkowska, S., Nowakowska, A., Kletkiewicz, H., & Rogalska, J. (2018). Altered heat nociception in cockroach Periplaneta americana L. exposed to capsaicin. PloS One, 13(3), e0194109. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194109
Mikhalevich, I., & Powell, R. (2020). Minds without spines: Evolutionarily inclusive animal ethics. Animal Sentience, 5(29). https://doi.org/10.51291/2377-7478.1527
Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938708408362
Overcast, T. D. (1985). Regulation of animal experimentation. JAMA, 254(14), 1944. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1985.03360140102034
Pintér, M. (2005). Memory consolidation and gene expression in periplaneta americana. Learning & Memory, 12(1), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.87905
Sneddon, L. U., Elwood, R. W., Adamo, S. A., & Leach, M. C. (2014). Defining and assessing animal pain. Animal Behaviour, 97, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.09.007
Walker, R. and Eggel, M. (2020). From mice to monkeys? beyond orthodox approaches to the ethics of animal model choice. Animals, 10(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10010077
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Daniel Mun; Dr. Sankar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.


