Examining Ohio High Schools' Smartphone Policies' Academic Efficacy

Authors

  • Alexander Ament St. Ignatius High School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.7447

Keywords:

Academic Performance, School Policy, Smartphone Use

Abstract

The academic efficacy of smartphone policies in high schools has been a hotly debated topic. Previous studies have quantitatively examined this topic in Britain, Spain, Norway, and Sweden, but they have somewhat conflicting results. Additionally, such a study has never been conducted in the United States, which has an altogether different schooling system than Europe. In the present study, I investigate (1) whether schoolwide smartphone policies increase students’ academic performance and (2) whether school technology programs, like 1:1 iPad or laptop or Bring Your Own Technology/Device programs, mitigate this impact, if it exists. I use public academic records from the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce and collect survey information from 192 public high schools in Ohio. Using a difference-in-difference analysis, I conclude that my hypothesis was partially correct: smartphone policies effectively increase students’ academic performance, but the results were inconclusive regarding technology programs. I advise that high schools across the nation continue to implement and maintain smartphone policies because they effectively remediate the detriments of smartphone use in schools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References or Bibliography

Abrahamsson, S. S. (2022). Essays on empirical labor and health economics [Doctoral dissertation, Norwegian School of Economics]. NHH Brage. hdl.handle.net/11250/3069282

Allen, J. (2015). New York City ends ban on cellphones in public schools. Reuters, reuters.com/article/us-usa-new-york-cell-phones/new-york-city-ends-ban-on-cellphones-in-public-schools-idUSKBN0KG1IS20150107

Angrist, N., de Barros, A., Bhula, R., Chaker, S., Cummiskey, C., DeStefano, J., Floretta, J., Kaffenberger, M., Piper, B., & Stern, J. (2021). Building back better to avert a learning catastrophe: Estimating learning loss from COVID-19 school shutdowns in Africa and facilitating short-term and long-term learning recovery. International Journal of Educational Development, 84, 102397. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102397

Beland, L.-P., & Murphy, R. (2016). Ill communication: Technology, distraction & student performance. Labour Economics, 41, 61-76. doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2016.04.004

Beneito, P., & Vicente-Chirivella, Ó. (2022). Banning mobile phones in schools: Evidence from regional-level policies in spain. Applied Economic Analysis, 30(90), 153-175. doi.org/10.1108/aea-05-2021-0112

Bishop, J. (2010). Which secondary education systems work best? The United States or northern Europe. Cornell University.

Campbell, D. E. (2006). What is education’s impact on civic and social engagement? Measuring the Effects of Education on Health and Civic Engagement: Proceedings of the Copenhagen Symposium, 25-126.

Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 151. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2009-title47/html/USCODE-2009-title47-chap5.htm

Diehl, M. (2020). European schools, American schools: 12 key differences. intercultural-reflections.de/10-key-ways-german-american-schools-differ/

Duli, K. (2019). American schools vs European schools. The Bardvark, retrieved 31 March, 2024, from thebardvark.com/articles/american-schools-vs-european-schools

Enrollment data. (n.d.). Ohio Department of Education & Workforce. Retrieved December 23, 2023, from education.ohio.gov/topic/data/frequently-requested-data/enrollment-data

Escueta, M., Quan, V., Nickow, A. J., & Oreopoulos, P. (2017). Education technology: An evidence-based review. National Bureau of Economic Research. doi.org/10.3386/w23744

Faber, B., Sanchi-Guarner, R., & Weinhardt, F. (2015). ICT and education: Evidence from student home addresses. National Bureau of Economic Research. doi.org/10.3386/w21306

Global Education Monitoring Report Team. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? GEM Report UNESCO. doi.org/10.54676/uzqv8501

Grajera, J. (2023). American vs European schools: which is really the best?. The Lance, retrieved March 31, 2024, from lhslance.org/2023/features/american-vs-european-schools-which-is-really-the-best/

Harris, J. & Al-Bataineh, A. (2015). One to One Technology and its Effect on Student Academic Achievement and Motivation. Proceedings of Global Learn Berlin 2015: Global Conference on Learning and Technology, 579-584. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). learntechlib.org/primary/p/150906/

Hernán, M. A., & Robins, J. M. (2018). Causal Inference. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, hsph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1268/2018/12/hernanrobins_v1.10.37.pdf

Huang, S., Lai, X., Li, Y., Luo, Y., & Wang, Y. (2021). Understanding juveniles’ problematic smartphone use and related influencing factors: A network perspective. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 10(3), 811-826. doi.org/10.1556/2006.2021.00048

Junco, R. (2012). In-class multitasking and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2236-2243. doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.031

Kaffenberger, M. (2021). Modelling the long-run learning impact of the COVID-19 learning shock: Actions to (more than) mitigate loss. International Journal of Educational Development, 81. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102326

Kessel, D., Hardardottir, H. L., & Tyrefors B. (2020). The impact of banning mobile phones in Swedish secondary schools. Economics of Education Review, 77. doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.102009

Lepp, A., Barkley, J.E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2015). The relationship between cell phone use and academic performance in a sample of U.S. college students. SAGE Open, 5(1). doi.org/10.1177/2158244015573169

Leuven, E., Lindahl, M., Oosterbeek, H., & Webbink, D. (2007). The effect of extra funding for disadvantaged pupils on achievement. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(4), 721-736. doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.4.721

Levin, S., & Bradley, K. (2021). Understanding and addressing principal turnover. National Association of Secondary School Principals and Learning Policy Institute. Education Resources Information Center. files.eric.ed.gov/EJ1342371.pdf

Machmud, K. (2018). The smartphone use in Indonesian schools: The high school students’ perspectives. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 7(3), 33-40. doi.org/10.18533/journal.v7i3.1354

Mrazek, A. J., Mrazek, M. D., Ortega, J. R., Ji, R. R., Karimi, S. S., Brown, C. S., Alexander, C. A., Khan, M., Panahi, R., Sadoff, M., Scott, A., Tyszka, J. E., & Schooler, J. W. (2021). Teenagers' smartphone use during homework: An analysis of beliefs and behaviors around digital multitasking. Education Sciences, 11(713). doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110713

Nord Anglia. (2023). British schools system vs. American - how do they differ? Nord Anglia International School New York. Retrieved November 17, 2023, from nordangliaeducation.com/nais-new-york/news/2020/10/29/british-school-system-vs-american

OEDS reports. (n.d.). Ohio Department of Education & Workforce. Retrieved November 23, 2023, from oeds.ode.state.oh.us/DataExtract

Ohio Department of Education. (2022). Understanding Ohio's state tests score reports 2022-2023. oh-ost.portal.cambiumast.com/resources/online-systems-resources/understanding-ohio's-state-tests-reports/2022-2023-understanding-score-reports

Ohio Department of Education report portal. (n.d.). Ohio Department of Education & Workforce. Retrieved December 23, 2023, from reports.education.ohio.gov/overview

Ohio Educational Directory System (n.d.). Ohio Department of Education & Workforce. Retrieved February 28, 2024, from education.ohio.gov/Topics/Data/Ohio-Educational-Directory-System-OEDS

Ohio high schools. (n.d.). High-Schools.com. Retrieved December 27, 2023, from high-schools.com/directory/oh

Ott, T. (2014). A historical materialist analysis of the debate in Swedish print media on mobile phones in school settings. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 6(2), 1-14. doi.org/10.4018/ijmbl.2014040101

Özdemir, C., Reiter, C., Yildiz, D., & Goujon, A. (2022). Projections of adult skills and the effect of COVID-19. PLoS One, 17(11). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277113

Palla, K. A., Spears, K., and Harter, E. S. (2018). America’s educational system lags behind Europe while U.S. university systems excel. International Journal of Business Management and Commerce, 3(3).

Presidential election accuracy data. (n.d.). Ballotpedia. Retrieved February 23, 2024, from ballotpedia.org/Presidential_election_accuracy_data

Rubin, A., & Peltier, E. (2018). France bans smartphones in schools through 9th grade. Will it help students? The New York Times, nytimes.com/2018/09/20/world/europe/france-smartphones-schools.html

Snowden, Frank M. (1959). A European view of American education. Faculty Reprints, 191, dh.howard.edu/reprints/191

StataCorp LLC. (2023). Stata (Basic ed., Version 18) [Computer software]. stata.com

Tandon, P. S., Zhou, C., Hogan, C. M., & Christakis, D. A. (2020). Cell phone use policies in US middle and high schools. JAMA Network Open, 3(5). doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5183

Test results with student demographic (school) - overview. (n.d.). Ohio Department of Education Reports Portal. Retrieved November 22, 2023, from reports.education.ohio.gov/report/report-card-data-school-test-results-with-student-disagg

best high schools in Ohio. (n.d.). Authority. Retrieved December 26, 2023, from authority.org/k12/states/ohio/high-schools

Vesterlund, J. (2023). European, American school systems differ in more ways than one. The Pirateer, retrieved March 31, 2024, from fhspirateer.com/4921/features-showcase/european-american-school-systems-differ-in-more-ways-than-one/

Vogels, E. A., Gelles-Watnick, R., & Massarat, N. (2022). Teens, social media, and technology 2022. Pew Research Center. pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2022/08/PI_2022.08.10_Teens-and-Tech_FINAL.pdf

Weale, S. (2023). Mobile phone ban in English schools ‘smokescreen’ to mask real issues, say critics. The Guardian, theguardian.com/education/2023/oct/02/ban-on-mobile-phones-in-english-schools-could-irk-teachers-and-parents#:~:text=Pupils%20can%20have%20their%20phones,it's%20lesson%20or%20break%20time.

Willeck, C., & Mendelberg, T. (2022). Education and political participation. Annual Review of Political Science, 25(1), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-014235

Yucel, C. (2021). European school vs American school. The Morgan PawPrint, retrieved March 31, 2024, from morganpawprint.com/67163/academics/european-school-vs-american-school/

Zheng, F., Gao, P., He, M., Li, M., Wang, C., Zeng, Q., Zhou, Z., Yu, Z., & Zhang, L. (2014). Association between mobile phone use and inattention in 7102 Chinese adolescents: A population-based cross-section study. BMC Public Health, 14(1). doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1022

Published

08-31-2024

How to Cite

Ament, A. (2024). Examining Ohio High Schools’ Smartphone Policies’ Academic Efficacy. Journal of Student Research, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.7447

Issue

Section

AP Capstone™ Research