Student-Led Kindness Intervention Boosts High School Students’ Well-being
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.7362Keywords:
student-led, peer-led, boarding school, web-based, random acts, kindness, well-being, happiness, gratitude, life satisfaction, experiment, randomized control, natural setting, autonomy.Abstract
Despite growing public concerns about high school students’ mental health, research into how kindness-based interventions affect their subjective well-being remains scant. This study addresses three research gaps in kindness-based interventions: adolescent-peer leadership throughout the experiment, administration outside laboratory or classroom settings, and applicability to boarding high school students. These gaps exist because kindness-based interventions for adolescents are a relatively new topic. Addressing these gaps may help improve the interventions' effectiveness and their costs. I hypothesized that a seven-day pay-it-forward random acts of kindness intervention would boost the subjective well-being of boarding high school students. Volunteer participants from a boarding high school were randomly assigned to an intervention group (random acts of kindness) or an active control group (tree observations). Thirty and thirty-two participants completed the study, respectively. I administered the experiment online via emails and a dedicated website. Results indicated a statistically significant enhancement in participants' happiness and a large effect size as measured by the Subjective Happiness Scale. Although improvements in gratitude and life satisfaction, as assessed by the Gratitude Questionnaire and the Satisfaction With Life Scale, respectively, were not statistically significant, their positive trends suggest that a broader impact on the school community’s subjective gratitude and life satisfaction might be achievable with a larger sample size or an extended intervention duration. This peer-led, simple, and cost-effective kindness-based intervention can be readily replicated by student leaders in day and boarding high schools on a sustainable and scalable basis, bolstering subjective well-being at both individual and school community levels.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., Kemeza, I., Nyende, P., Ashton-James, C. E., & Norton, M. I. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 635–652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031578
Aknin, L. B., Broesch, T., Hamlin, J. K., & Van de Vondervoort, J. W. (2015). Prosocial behavior leads to happiness in a small-scale rural society. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(4), 788-795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000082
Aknin, L. B., Hamlin, J. K., & Dunn, E. W. (2012). Giving leads to happiness in young children. PLOS ONE, 7(6), e39211, 1-4. http://dx.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039211
Aknin, L. B., Sandstrom, G. M., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2011). It's the recipient that counts: Spending money on strong social ties leads to greater happiness than spending on weak social ties. PLOS ONE, 6(2), e17018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017018
Bartholomay, E. M., & Sifers, S. K. (2016). Student perception of pressure in faculty-led research. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 302-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.025
Buchanan, K. E., & Bardi, A. (2010). Acts of kindness and acts of novelty affect life satisfaction. Journal of Social Psychology, 150(3), 235–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903365554
Chancellor, J., Margolis, S., Jacobs Bao, K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2018). Everyday prosociality in the workplace: The reinforcing benefits of giving, getting, and glimpsing. Emotion, 18(4), 507-517. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000321
Curry, O. S., Rowland, L. A., Van Lissa, C. J., Zlotowitz, S., McAlaney, J., & Whitehouse, H. (2018). Happy to help? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of performing acts of kindness on the well-being of the actor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 320-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.02.014
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Finkelstein, M. A., Penner, L. A., & Brannick, M. T. (2005). An examination of role identity and motives among hospice volunteers. Social Behavior and Personality, 33, 403-418. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2005.33.4.403
Fujita, Frank, and Ed Diener. (2005) Life satisfaction set point: stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88, no. 1: 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.158
Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). Statistically small effects of the Implicit Association Test can have societally large effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000016
Hui, B. P., Ng, J. C., Berzaghi, E., Cunningham-Amos, L. A., & Kogan, A. (2020). Rewards of kindness? A meta-analysis of the link between prosociality and well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 146(12), 1084-1116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000298
Kunda, Z., & Schwartz, S. H. (1983). Undermining intrinsic moral motivation: External reward and self-presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 763–771.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.763
Lanser, I., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2023). Prosocial behavior reliably reduces loneliness: An investigation across two studies. Emotion, 23(6), 1781-1790. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001179
Layous, K., Nelson, S. K., Oberle, E., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2012). Kindness counts: Prompting prosocial behavior in preadolescents boosts peer acceptance and well-being. PLOS ONE, 7(12), e51380. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051380
Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006824100041
McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 112-127. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.112
McGrath, R. E., Mitchell, M., Kim, B. H., & Hough, L. (2010). Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 450-470. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019216
Nelson, S. K., Della Porta, M. D., Jacobs Bao, K., Lee, H. C., Choi, I., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2015). ‘It’s up to you’: Experimentally manipulated autonomy support for prosocial behavior improves well-being in two cultures over six weeks. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(5), 463-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.983959
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., & Mulrow, C. D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLOS Medicine, 18(3), e1003583. https://doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164
Post, S. G. (2005). Altruism, happiness, and health: It’s good to be good. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12, 66–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm1202_4
Rowland, L., & Curry, O. S. (2019). A range of kindness activities boosts happiness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(3), 340-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1469461
Santini, Z. I., Pisinger, V. S., Nielsen, L., Madsen, K. R., Nelausen, M. K., Koyanagi, A., Kosher, V., Roffey, S., Thygesen, L. C., & Meilstrup, C. (2021). Social disconnectedness, loneliness, and mental health among adolescents in Danish high schools: A nationwide cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 632906. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.632906
Tashjian, S. M., Rahal, D., Karan, M., Eisenberger, N., Galván, A., Cole, S. W., & Fuligni, A. J. (2021). Evidence from a randomized controlled trial that altruism moderates the effect of prosocial acts on adolescent well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50, 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01362-3
U.S. Department of Education. (2021). Supporting child and student social, emotional, behavioral, and mental health needs. U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/documents/students/supporting-child-student-social-emotional-behavioral-mental-health.pdf
Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 222–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016984
Wray-Lake, L., DeHaan, C. R., Shubert, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2019). Examining links from civic engagement to daily well-being from a self-determination theory perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(2), 166-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1388432
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Nathan HU; Dr. Leah Domb

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.


