Student-Led Kindness Intervention Boosts High School Students’ Well-being

Authors

  • Nathan HU The Lawrenceville School
  • Dr. Leah Domb The Lawrenceville School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.7362

Keywords:

student-led, peer-led, boarding school, web-based, random acts, kindness, well-being, happiness, gratitude, life satisfaction, experiment, randomized control, natural setting, autonomy.

Abstract

Despite growing public concerns about high school students’ mental health, research into how kindness-based interventions affect their subjective well-being remains scant. This study addresses three research gaps in kindness-based interventions: adolescent-peer leadership throughout the experiment, administration outside laboratory or classroom settings, and applicability to boarding high school students. These gaps exist because kindness-based interventions for adolescents are a relatively new topic. Addressing these gaps may help improve the interventions' effectiveness and their costs. I hypothesized that a seven-day pay-it-forward random acts of kindness intervention would boost the subjective well-being of boarding high school students. Volunteer participants from a boarding high school were randomly assigned to an intervention group (random acts of kindness) or an active control group (tree observations). Thirty and thirty-two participants completed the study, respectively. I administered the experiment online via emails and a dedicated website. Results indicated a statistically significant enhancement in participants' happiness and a large effect size as measured by the Subjective Happiness Scale. Although improvements in gratitude and life satisfaction, as assessed by the Gratitude Questionnaire and the Satisfaction With Life Scale, respectively, were not statistically significant, their positive trends suggest that a broader impact on the school community’s subjective gratitude and life satisfaction might be achievable with a larger sample size or an extended intervention duration. This peer-led, simple, and cost-effective kindness-based intervention can be readily replicated by student leaders in day and boarding high schools on a sustainable and scalable basis, bolstering subjective well-being at both individual and school community levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nathan HU, The Lawrenceville School

I am a junior at Lawrenceville School.

References or Bibliography

Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., Kemeza, I., Nyende, P., Ashton-James, C. E., & Norton, M. I. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 635–652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031578

Aknin, L. B., Broesch, T., Hamlin, J. K., & Van de Vondervoort, J. W. (2015). Prosocial behavior leads to happiness in a small-scale rural society. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(4), 788-795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000082

Aknin, L. B., Hamlin, J. K., & Dunn, E. W. (2012). Giving leads to happiness in young children. PLOS ONE, 7(6), e39211, 1-4. http://dx.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039211

Aknin, L. B., Sandstrom, G. M., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2011). It's the recipient that counts: Spending money on strong social ties leads to greater happiness than spending on weak social ties. PLOS ONE, 6(2), e17018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017018

Bartholomay, E. M., & Sifers, S. K. (2016). Student perception of pressure in faculty-led research. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 302-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.025

Buchanan, K. E., & Bardi, A. (2010). Acts of kindness and acts of novelty affect life satisfaction. Journal of Social Psychology, 150(3), 235–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903365554

Chancellor, J., Margolis, S., Jacobs Bao, K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2018). Everyday prosociality in the workplace: The reinforcing benefits of giving, getting, and glimpsing. Emotion, 18(4), 507-517. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000321

Curry, O. S., Rowland, L. A., Van Lissa, C. J., Zlotowitz, S., McAlaney, J., & Whitehouse, H. (2018). Happy to help? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of performing acts of kindness on the well-being of the actor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 320-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.02.014

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

Finkelstein, M. A., Penner, L. A., & Brannick, M. T. (2005). An examination of role identity and motives among hospice volunteers. Social Behavior and Personality, 33, 403-418. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2005.33.4.403

Fujita, Frank, and Ed Diener. (2005) Life satisfaction set point: stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88, no. 1: 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.158

Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202

Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). Statistically small effects of the Implicit Association Test can have societally large effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000016

Hui, B. P., Ng, J. C., Berzaghi, E., Cunningham-Amos, L. A., & Kogan, A. (2020). Rewards of kindness? A meta-analysis of the link between prosociality and well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 146(12), 1084-1116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000298

Kunda, Z., & Schwartz, S. H. (1983). Undermining intrinsic moral motivation: External reward and self-presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 763–771.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.763

Lanser, I., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2023). Prosocial behavior reliably reduces loneliness: An investigation across two studies. Emotion, 23(6), 1781-1790. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001179

Layous, K., Nelson, S. K., Oberle, E., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2012). Kindness counts: Prompting prosocial behavior in preadolescents boosts peer acceptance and well-being. PLOS ONE, 7(12), e51380. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051380

Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006824100041

McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 112-127. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.112

McGrath, R. E., Mitchell, M., Kim, B. H., & Hough, L. (2010). Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 450-470. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019216

Nelson, S. K., Della Porta, M. D., Jacobs Bao, K., Lee, H. C., Choi, I., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2015). ‘It’s up to you’: Experimentally manipulated autonomy support for prosocial behavior improves well-being in two cultures over six weeks. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(5), 463-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.983959

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., & Mulrow, C. D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLOS Medicine, 18(3), e1003583. https://doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164

Post, S. G. (2005). Altruism, happiness, and health: It’s good to be good. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12, 66–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm1202_4

Rowland, L., & Curry, O. S. (2019). A range of kindness activities boosts happiness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(3), 340-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1469461

Santini, Z. I., Pisinger, V. S., Nielsen, L., Madsen, K. R., Nelausen, M. K., Koyanagi, A., Kosher, V., Roffey, S., Thygesen, L. C., & Meilstrup, C. (2021). Social disconnectedness, loneliness, and mental health among adolescents in Danish high schools: A nationwide cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 632906. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.632906

Tashjian, S. M., Rahal, D., Karan, M., Eisenberger, N., Galván, A., Cole, S. W., & Fuligni, A. J. (2021). Evidence from a randomized controlled trial that altruism moderates the effect of prosocial acts on adolescent well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50, 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01362-3

U.S. Department of Education. (2021). Supporting child and student social, emotional, behavioral, and mental health needs. U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/documents/students/supporting-child-student-social-emotional-behavioral-mental-health.pdf

Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 222–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016984

Wray-Lake, L., DeHaan, C. R., Shubert, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2019). Examining links from civic engagement to daily well-being from a self-determination theory perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(2), 166-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1388432

Published

08-31-2024

How to Cite

HU, N., & Domb, L. (2024). Student-Led Kindness Intervention Boosts High School Students’ Well-being. Journal of Student Research, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.7362

Issue

Section

HS Research Articles