Corrugated Airfoil Shape Effect on Aerodynamic Efficiency of a 3D Printed Remote Control Plane

Authors

  • Gracye Lamb Etowah High School
  • John Murnan Etowah High School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.7337

Keywords:

3D printing, airfoil, corrugated, biomimicry, remote control, electronics, aeronautical engineering, turbulence, airflow, computational fluid dynamics, lift to drag ratio, lift coefficient, drag coefficient, Reynold's number, flow regime, efficiency, aerodynamic

Abstract

Early wind tunnel experiments and subsequent studies have shown that corrugated wings offer comparable or superior aerodynamic efficiency to smooth wings, with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) confirming these benefits. However, the effects of turbulence on these designs and their practical application to Micro Air Vehicles (MAVs) has yet to be thoroughly tested. A two-part experimental method involving CFD analysis and flight time tests was employed to evaluate the impact of various corrugated wing designs on the performance of an MAV, with a smooth airfoil as a control, aiming to measure aerodynamic efficiency through lift-to-drag ratios and flight times. The experiment found that that there was no significant correlation between lift-to-drag ratios and total flight times, though a minor positive correlation existed between flight times and speed and minor negative correlation with flight times and mass, and a moderately strong inverse correlation was found between speed and mass. The study found that corrugated airfoils generally can improve aerodynamic efficiency, though results varied significantly, indicating that not all corrugated designs are equally beneficial. Further, while CFD analysis showed inconsistencies compared to previous studies, it highlighted that the turbulent atmospheric layer impacts real-world aerodynamic performance, suggesting that CFD alone may not reliably predict flight efficiency of corrugated wings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References or Bibliography

Abd El-Latief, M. E., Elsayed, K., & Madbouli Abdelrahman, M. (2019). Aerodynamic study of the corrugated airfoil at ultra-low Reynolds number. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 11(10), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814019884164

All3DP. (2022, July 5). Best 3D printer filament: the main types in 2022. https://all3dp.com/1/3d-printer-filament-types-3d-printing-3d-filament/

Benson, T. (Ed.). (2021, May 13). The drag coefficient. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/rocket/dragco.html

Biradar, G. S., Bankey, S., Mishra, A., Joshi, G., & Agrawal, A. (2022). Effect of free stream turbulence intensity on corrugated airfoils at ultra low Reynolds numbers. Sādhanā, 47(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-022-01861-y

Hall, N. (Ed.). (2022, October 20). Lift coefficient. Glenn Research Center. https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/beginners-guide-to-aeronautics/lift-coefficient/

Helmenstine, A. M. (2020, August 28). What Is the Density of Air at STP?. ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/density-of-air-at-stp-607546

Jain, S., Bhatt, V., & Mittal, S. (2015). Shape optimization of corrugated airfoils. Computational Mechanics, 56(6), 917–930. https://doi-org.proxygsu-sche.galileo.usg.edu/10.1007/s00466-015-1210-x

KendinYap. (2020, May 19). How to make RC trainer airplane. DIY model airplane for beginners. rcpano.net. https://www.rcpano.net/2020/05/19/how-to-make-rc-trainer-airplane-diy-model-airplane-for-beginners/

Kesel A. B. (2000). Aerodynamic characteristics of dragonfly wing sections compared with technical aerofoils. The Journal of experimental biology, 203(20), 3125–3135. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.203.20.3125

Kim, W.-K., Ko, J. H., Park, H. C., & Byuan, D. (2009). Effects of corrugation of the dragonfly wing on gliding performance. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 260(4), 523-530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.07.015

Kurak, R. (2022, July 28). Drag coefficient. NASA Glenn Research Center. https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/beginners-guide-to-aeronautics/drag-coefficient/

Kurak, R. (2022, July 28). Lift coefficient. NASA Glenn Research Center. https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/beginners-guide-to-aeronautics/lift-coefficient/

Luo, G., & Sun, M. (2005). The effects of corrugation and wing planform on the aerodynamic force production of sweeping model insect wings. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 21(6), 531–541. https://doi-org.proxygsu-sche.galileo.usg.edu/10.1007/s10409-005-0072-4

Okamoto, M., Yasuda, K., & Azuma, A. (1996). Aerodynamic characteristics of the wings and body of a dragonfly. The Journal of experimental biology, 199(2), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.199.2.281

Rees, C. J. C. (1975). Aerodynamic properties of an insect wing section and a smooth aerofoil compared. Nature, 258, 141–142. https://doi.org/10.1038/258141a0

Rees, C. J. C. (1975). Form and function in corrugated insect wings. Nature, 256, 200–203. https://doi.org/10.1038/256200a0

Rose, J. B. R., Natarajan, S. G., & Gopinathan, V. T. (2021). Biomimetic flow control techniques for aerospace applications: a comprehensive review. Reviews in Environmental Science& Biotechnology, 20(3), 645–677. https://doi-org.proxygsu-sche.galileo.usg.edu/10.1007/s11157-021-09583-z

Published

08-31-2024

How to Cite

Lamb, G., & Murnan, J. (2024). Corrugated Airfoil Shape Effect on Aerodynamic Efficiency of a 3D Printed Remote Control Plane. Journal of Student Research, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.7337

Issue

Section

AP Capstone™ Research