Analyzing the American Public’s Views on the Uses of Modern Neural Implants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.7311Keywords:
Neural implants, Public opinions, Brain-computer interfacesAbstract
Researchers are currently developing neural implants, specifically brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), to help people move, communicate, and think. BCIs work by recording neural activity through a surgically implanted device, and then transferring that information to a computer that can react to help the person perform a specific ability, such as typing words thought by the implantee. BCIs have several potential applications in the medical field and in the field of human enhancement, but there is not a significant body of research regarding how people view the different uses. This study aimed to figure out what kinds of BCI uses are socially acceptable, and if any age groups are significantly more or less trusting of certain uses. The data was collected through a digital survey and in the end, there were 37 responses. The results showed that the tested population was generally accepting of BCIs when they are used to treat physical conditions, but not supportive of BCIs used to treat mental conditions or enhance human capabilities. Additionally, there was no correlation between age and views on BCIs.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Breslau, J., Aharoni, E., Pedersen, E. R., & Miller, L. L. (2015). Understanding the Emerging Science of PIU. In A Review of Research on Problematic Internet Use and Well-Being: With Recommendations for the U.S. Air Force (pp. 3–12). RAND Corporation. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt14bs4q1.10.
Budin-Ljøsne, I., Friedman, B. B., Suri, S., Solé-Padullés, C., Düzel, S., Drevon, C. A., Baaré, W. F. C., Mowinckel, A. M., Zsoldos, E., Madsen, K. S., Carver, R. B., Ghisletta, P., Arnesen, M. R., Bartrés Faz, D., Brandmaier, A. M., Fjell, A. M., Kvalbein, A., Henson, R. N., Kievit, R. A., Nawijn, L., … Zasiekina, L. (2020). The Global Brain Health Survey: Development of a Multi-Language Survey of Public Views on Brain Health. Frontiers in public health, 8, 387. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00387 .
Carver, R. B., Fredheim, N. A. G., Mowinckel, A. M., Ebmeier, K. P., Friedman, B. B., Rosness, T. A., Drevon, C. A., Suri, S., Baaré, W. F. C., Zsoldos, E., Solé-Padullés, C., Bartrés-Faz, D., Ghisletta, P., Nawijn, L., Düzel, S., Madsen, K. S., Fjell, A. M., Lindenberger, U., Walhovd, K. B., & Budin-Ljøsne, I. (2022). People's interest in brain health testing: Findings from an international, online cross-sectional survey. Frontiers in public health, 10, 998302. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.998302.
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Golsteyn, B.H.H., Huffman, D. and Sunde, U. (2017), Risk Attitudes Across The Life Course. Econ J, 127: F95-F116. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12322.
Dougherty, M. V. (2021). The use of confidentiality and anonymity protections as a cover for fraudulent fieldwork data. Research Ethics, 17(4), 480-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211018257
Friedman, Daniel R. Mark Isaac , Duncan James and Shyam Sunder. Risky Curves: On the empirical failure of expected utility theory, Routledge, 2014, xiii 137 pages. Economics & Philosophy, 32(3), 540-548. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267116000183.
Funk, C., Kennedy, B., & Sciupac, E. P. (2016, July 26). U.S. Public Wary About Use of Biomedical Technology for Human Enhancement. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2016/07/26/u-s-public-wary-of-biomedical-technologies-to-enhance-human-abilities/
Griffin, A. (2024, March 20). First human with Neuralink brain chip demonstrates moving cursor with his thoughts. New York Post. Retrieved April 26, 2024, from https://nypost.com/2024/03/20/us-news/first-human-with-neuralink-brain-chip-demonstrates-moving-cursor-with-his-thoughts/
Hassan, Z. A., Schattner, P., & Mazza, D. (2006). Doing A Pilot Study: Why Is It Essential?. Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 1(2-3), 70–73.
Howard, J. (2023, August 24). Brain implants can help people with paralysis ‘speak’ through screens faster, more accurately than before, new studies show. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/23/health/brain-implants-speech-scn/index.html
Jangwan, N. S., Ashraf, G. M., Ram, V., Singh, V., Alghamdi, B. S., Abuzenadah, A. M., & Singh, M. F. (2022). Brain augmentation and neuroscience technologies: current applications, challenges, ethics and future prospects. Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 16, 1000495. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2022.1000495
Josef, A. K., Richter, D., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., Wagner, G. G., Hertwig, R., & Mata, R. (2016). Stability and change in risk-taking propensity across the adult life span. Journal of personality and social psychology, 111(3), 430–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000090.
Mata, R., Frey, R., Richter, D., Schupp, J., & Hertwig, R. (2018). Risk Preference: A View from Psychology. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(2), 155–172. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26409429.
McDermott-Murphy, C. (2019, March 12). Harvard: Neuronlike brain implants may help treat disease, mental illness. Harvard Gazette. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2019/03/harvard-neuronlike-brain-implants-may-help-treat-disease-mental-illness/
Musk, E., & Neuralink (2019). An Integrated Brain-Machine Interface Platform With Thousands of Channels. Journal of medical Internet research, 21(10), e16194. https://doi.org/10.2196/16194
Neuralink. (2024). Neuralink. http://neuralink.com
NIH. (2016, March 16). Guiding Principles for Ethical Research. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Retrieved April 27, 2024, from https://www.nih.gov/health-information/nih-clinical-research-trials-you/guiding-principles-ethical-research
Pannucci, C. J., & Wilkins, E. G. (2010). Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 126(2), 619–625. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc
Rainie, L., Funk, C., Anderson, M., & Tyson, A. (2022, March 17). AI and Human Enhancement: Americans' Openness Is Tempered by a Range of Concerns. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/03/17/ai-and-human-enhancement-americans-openness-is-tempered-by-a-range-of-concerns/
Saha, S., Mamun, K., Ahmed, K., Mostafa, R., Naik, G., Darvishi, S., Khandoker, A., & Baumert, M. (2021, January 6). Progress in Brain Computer Interface: Challenges and Opportunities. Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2021.578875
Salkind, N. J. (2010). Encyclopedia of Research Design. SAGE.
Steinberg L. (2013). The influence of neuroscience on US Supreme Court decisions about adolescents' criminal culpability. Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 14(7), 513–518. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3509.
Unkelbach, F., John, M., & Vogel, V. (2023). Jumping on the Bandwagon: The Role of Voters' Social Class in Poll Effects in the Context of the 2021 German Federal Election. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 64(1), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-022-00417-3
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 2018. “BLS Data Finder 1.1: Various Series from Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey.” Washington: U.S. Department of Labor. Accessed July 1, 2018. https://beta.bls.gov/dataQuery/find?fq=survey:%5Bln%5D&s=popularity:D.
Willett, F., Kunz, E., Fan, C., Avansino, D., Wilson, G., Choi, E., Kamdar, F., Glasser, M., Hochberg, L., Druckmann, S., Shenoy, K., & Henderson, J. (2023, August 23). A High-Performance Speech Neuroprosthesis. nature.com. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06377-x
Yagi, Y., & Inoue, K. (2018). The Contribution of Attention to the Mere Exposure Effect for Parts of Advertising Images. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1635. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01635
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Jayne McGovern; Soo Park
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
