Comparing Machiavelli and Aristotle’s Advice for Tyrants

Abstract

Machiavelli’s advice, which is on the basis that a prince wishes to attain glory, is that the prince must be able to undertake ferocious actions. To achieve glory, a prince ought to have powers, and to achieve glory with this power, this power needs to be used effectively. One ought to do what is best for the people, which could entail vicious deeds. But, since the ruler only needs to have a reputation and legacy of virtue instead of acting virtuous at all times, Machiavelli argues that one ought to act vicious when necessary, with temperance, prudence, and timing. Aristotle, however, offers an alternative, urging the tyrant to become king-like for the sake of both his own safety and the people. Upon assessing the two’s colliding advice along with modern psychological evidence, Aristotle’s advice is wiser.