Novel Diagnostic Methods for Endometriosis

Authors

  • Anushka Tejeswi Gifted Gabber

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i4.5766

Keywords:

Endometriosis, diagnosis, Biomarkers, Laparoscopy

Abstract

Endometriosis is a detrimental disease that affects millions of women globally often resulting in symptoms as serious as infertility. While this disease is so prevalent, limited research and funding in search of diagnostic methods exists to this day. Currently, the gold standard for diagnosing endometriosis is through an extremely invasive surgery called a laparoscopy. As many women do not want to go through with this surgery it leads to countless women around the world unaware of the fact that they possess this disease.  This paper intends to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of emerging diagnostic techniques such as biomarkers, imaging modalities, and additional tests for the early detection and diagnosis of endometriosis. Through a comprehensive literature review and examining existing studies, this paper aims to highlight the positives and negatives of various diagnostic methods in order to replace the gold standard invasive laparoscopy surgery. By evaluating these various diagnostic techniques, the use of biomarkers and targeting miRNA cells proved to be more promising for future diagnosis of endometriosis. They were cost-effective, reliable, and non-invasive. The other diagnostic methods were somewhat favorable however they lacked enough research and reliability. Through these evaluations, it is able to be seen that there are additional methods for diagnosing endometriosis which are far less invasive. More money and research is required in the field of endometriosis and women’s health, in general, to acquire FDA funding for these methods and allow for fewer women globally to suffer from the painful side effects of this harmful disease.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References or Bibliography

Szubert, M., Rycerz, A., & Wilczyński, J. R. (2023). How to Improve Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Endometriosis with Advanced Statistical Methods. Medicina, 59(3), 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030499

Bendifallah, S., Suisse, S., Puchar, A., Delbos, L., Poilblanc, M., Descamps, P., Golfier, F., Jornea, L., Bouteiller, D., Touboul, C., Dabi, Y., & Daraï, E. (2022). Salivary MicroRNA signature for diagnosis of endometriosis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(3), 612. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030612

Bazot, M., & Daraï, E. (2017). Diagnosis of deep endometriosis: clinical examination, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and other techniques. Fertility and Sterility, 108(6), 886–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.026

Ahn, S. H., Singh, V. K., & Tayade, C. (2017). Biomarkers in endometriosis: challenges and opportunities. Fertility and Sterility, 107(3), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.009

Wang, W., Sun, Y., Huang, W., He, B., Zhao, Y., & Chen, Y. (2016). Genome-wide long non-coding RNA analysis identified circulating LNCRNAs as novel non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers for gynecological disease. Scientific Reports, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23343

Nisenblat, V., Prentice, L., Bossuyt, P. M., Farquhar, C., Hull, M. L., & Johnson, N. (2016). Combination of the non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of endometriosis. The Cochrane Library, 2016(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd012281

Anastasiu, C. V., Moga, M., Neculau, A. E., Bălan, A., Scarneciu, I., Dragomir, R., Dull, A., & Chicea, L. (2020). Biomarkers for the Noninvasive diagnosis of Endometriosis: State of the art and future Perspectives. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(5), 1750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051750

Published

11-30-2023

How to Cite

Tejeswi, A. (2023). Novel Diagnostic Methods for Endometriosis. Journal of Student Research, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i4.5766

Issue

Section

HS Research Projects