How the Dunning-Kruger Effect Impairs Professional Judgement in High-risk Professions

Authors

  • Adan Rubin Winchester College
  • Ellen Froustis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i4.5623

Keywords:

Dunning-Kruger effect, Self-protection, High-risk professions

Abstract

The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias whereby people with limited expertise in a given area overestimate their own competence and subsequently make poor decisions. In this paper, we review the bias in high-risk professions, within which overestimations of self-efficacy can lead to harmful and even fatal consequences. We explore the bias's effect on students (in medicine and aviation) whose inexperience assigns them a higher disposition to unmerited confidence. Moreover, we address the bias's effect in criminal investigations and emergency situations. This review finds that Dunning's dual burden account partnered with a self-serving bias is the best explanation for the Dunning-Kruger effect. The cognitive bias is ubiquitous and leads to insupportable degradations in professional performance. The bias was prevalent among medical and aviation students and also adversely affected the criminal investigation process: investigators ignored a self-evaluation process needed to improve interrogation skills. The principal correctives to the cognitive bias (Rahmani, 2020) are twofold. Firstly, management needs to be aware of the effect and understand that subordinates' projected self-confidence does not necessarily correlate to capability. Secondly, an organizational structure incorporating continual constructive criticism and evaluation from numerous sources is essential. Supervisors should not rely solely on self-assessment and should remember that self-doubt is critical to improvement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References or Bibliography

Andrade, H., & Boulay, B. (2003). Role of rubric-referenced self-assessment in learning to write. Journal

of Educational Research, 97(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670309596625

Campbell, K. W., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic

integration. Review of General Psychology, 3, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23

Casner (2008) General aviation pilots’ attitudes toward advanced cockpit systems, International Journal

of Applied Aviation Studies, 8 (1), 88–112.

Deb, N. & Roy, P. (2021). Prevalence of Dunning Kruger effect in first year medical students in a tertiary

care hospital. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. 8(11):5283-5287.

Dreyfus. (2004). The Five-Stage Model of Adult Skill Acquisition. Bulletin of Science, Technology &

Society, 24(3), 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467604264992

Dunning, D., & McElwee, R. O. (1995). Idiosyncratic trait definitions: Implications for self-description and social judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 936–946. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.936

FURNHAM, & GASSON, L. (1998). Sex differences in parental estimates of their children’s intelligence. Sex Roles, 38(1-2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018772830511

Griffiths, A. (2008). An examination into the efficacy of police advanced investigative interview training? (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK

Grunhol, D. (2011) The Dunning–Kruger Effect in Aviation. Blog. Retrieved from http://www.eaa.org/lightplaneworld/articles/1002_dunning_ kruger.asp

Kihlström, J. F., Beer, J. S., & Klein, S. B. (2003). Self and identity as memory. In M. R. Leary& J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 68–90).

Kruger, & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121

Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 711–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711

Pavel, Robertson, M. F., & Harrison, B. T. (2012). The Dunning-Kruger Effect and SIUC University’s Aviation Students. Journal of Aviation Technology and Engineering, 2(1), 125–129. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314864

Prentice, D. A. (1990). Familiarity and differences in self- and other-representation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.3.369

Rahmani, M. (2020). Medical Trainees and the Dunning–Kruger Effect: When They Don’t Know What They Don’t Know. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, pg.532-543.) https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-20-00134.1

Reilly, Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2022). Gender Differences in Self-Estimated Intelligence: Exploring the Male Hubris, Female Humility Problem. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 812483–812483. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812483

Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (2007). Better, stronger, faster: Self-serving judgement, affect regulation, and the optimal vigilance hypothesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00033.x

Sargeant, Mann, K., Sinclair, D., Van der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2008). Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 13(3), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9039-x

Sedikides, C., Campbell, W. K., Reeder, G., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). The self in relationships: Whether, how, and when close others put the self “in its place.” In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 237–265). https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000076

Sedikides, C., Green, J. D., & Pinter, B. (2004). Self-protective memory. In D. R. Beike, J. M. Lampinen, & D. A. Behrend (Eds.), The self and memory (pp. 161–179)

Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2006). The self as a point of contact between social psychology and motivation. In P. A. M. Van Lange (Ed.), Bridging social psychology, pp. 233–238.

Shepherd, E., & Griffiths, A. (2013). Investigative interviewing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Siems. (2016). Disaster Threat and the Dunning-Kruger Effect. Homeland Security Affairs.

Skowronski, J. J., Gibbons, J. A., Vogl, R. J., & Walker, W. R. (2004). The effect of social disclosure on the affective intensity provoked by autobiographical memories. Self and Identity, 3, 285–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500444000065

Marsar, S. (2013). “Why Some People Live and Some People Die in the Same Emergencies and Disasters: Can the General Public Be Taught to Save Themselves?”. Master’s thesis, Naval Postgraduate School.

McIntosh, R.D. and Della Sala, S. (2022). Overconfident defenders of the Dunning-Kruger effect. The Psychologist. The British Psychological Society. Blog. Retrieved from: https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/overconfident-defenders-dunning-kruger-effect

Ross, L. (1977). The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process1. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173-220). Academic Press.

Surdilovic et al (2022). Evaluation of the Dunning-Kruger Effects among Dental Students at an Academic Training Institution in UAE. ACTA Stomatologica Croatia, 56(3):299-310. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc56/3/8

Taylor, E. (2014). Honour among thieves? How morality and rationality influence the decision-making processes of convicted domestic burglars. Criminology and Criminal Justice; An International Journal, 14, 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895813505232

The Decision Lab, (n.d.). Why can we not perceive our own abilities? The Dunning–Kruger Effect explained. Blog. Accessed: from: https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/dunning-kruger-effect

Walker, W. R., Skowronski, J. J., & Thompson, C. P. (2003). Life is pleasant – and memory helps to keep it that way. Review of General Psychology, 7, 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.2.203

Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2010). What really is effective in interviews with suspects? A study comparing interviewing skills against interviewing outcomes. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 305– 321. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X463356

Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2011). Benefit fraud investigative interviewing: A self-report study of investigation professionals’ beliefs concerning practice. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8, 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.137

Walsh, & Bull, R. (2015). Interviewing suspects: examining the association between skills, questioning, evidence disclosure, and interview outcomes. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(7), 661–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1028544

Walsh, King, M., & Griffiths, A. (2017). Evaluating interviews which search for the truth with suspects: but are investigators’ self-assessments of their own skills truthful ones? Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(7), 647–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1296149

Walsh, D., & Milne, R. (2008). Keeping the PEACE? A study of investigative interviewing practices in the public sector. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532506X157179

Zenger, T. R. (1992). Why do employers only reward extreme performance? Examining the relationships among performance, pay, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(2), 198–219. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393221

Published

11-30-2023

How to Cite

Rubin, A., & Froustis, E. (2023). How the Dunning-Kruger Effect Impairs Professional Judgement in High-risk Professions. Journal of Student Research, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i4.5623

Issue

Section

HS Review Articles