Combatting Rape Myth Acceptance in United States' Criminal Justice System with Behavioral Economics

Authors

  • Naina Giri Anglo Chinese International School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i2.4357

Keywords:

Criminal Justice System, Rape Myth Acceptance, Judicial Decision Making, United States

Abstract

Using behavioral economics, this paper aims to analyze how rape myth acceptance presents itself in the form of numerous heuristics and biases throughout various stages of the United States’ criminal justice process that a sexual assault case must progress through. Due to the availability heuristic, inaccurate representation of sexual assault in the media promotes rape myth acceptance (RMA) among the general public, including potential jurors and law enforcement officers. Resultantly, police officers’ decision-making processes while investigating sexual assault reports implicitly discriminate female victims as officers struggle with the downstream orientation phenomenon.. In the trial stage, jurors utilize the representativeness heuristic to process complex case information by comparing the rape victim to a mental prototype shaped by rape myths. This hinders the jurors’ human information processing capabilities. Solutions to rape myth acceptance in the United States’ criminal justice system will be described in order to battle the high attrition rate of sexual assault cases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References or Bibliography

"The Criminal Justice System: Statistics." RAINN, www.rainn.org/statistics/criminal-justice-system.

Alderden, Megan A, and Sarah E Ullman. “Creating a more complete and current picture: examining police and prosecutor decision-making when processing sexual assault cases.” Violence against women vol. 18,5 (2012): 525-51. doi:10.1177/1077801212453867

Bertrand, Marianne, and Sendhil Mullainathan. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination.” The American Economic Review, vol. 94, no. 4, 2004, pp. 991–1013. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3592802. doi:10.1257/0002828042002561

Bertrand, Marianne, Dolly Chugh, and Sendhil Mullainathan. "Implicit discrimination." American Economic Review 95.2 (2004): 94-98. doi:10.1257/000282805774670365

Bohner, Gerd, et al. "Rape myth acceptance: Cognitive, affective and behavioural effects of beliefs that blame the victim and exonerate the perpetrator." Rape. Willan, 2013. 17-45.

Brekke, Nancy, and Eugene Borgida. "Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social-cognitive analysis." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55.3 (1988): 372. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.372

Campbell, Rebecca, et al. "The Detroit sexual assault kit (SAK) action research project (ARP), final report." US DOJ 248680 (2015). doi:10.3886/ICPSR35632.v1

Campbell, Rebecca. "What really happened? A validation study of rape survivors’ help-seeking experiences with the legal and medical systems." Violence and victims 20.1 (2005): 55-68. doi:10.1891/vivi.2005.20.1.55

Feild, Hubert S. "Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36.2 (1978): 156. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.2.156

Feild, Hubert S. "Juror background characteristics and attitudes toward rape: Correlates of jurors' decisions in rape trials." Law and Human Behavior 2.2 (1978): 73-93. doi:10.1007/BF01040385

Gerbasi, Kathleen C., Miron Zuckerman, and Harry T. Reis. "Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research." Psychological Bulletin 84.2 (1977): 323. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.2.323

Gianvanni, Elena, and Stefanie J. Sharman. "Legal Representatives’ Opinions regarding Psychologists Engaging in Expert Witness Services in Australian Courts and Tribunals." Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 24.2 (2017): 223-232. doi:10.1080/13218719.2016.1254589

Gove, Tracey G. "Implicit bias and law enforcement." The Police Chief 78.10 (2011): 4456.

Greenwald, Anthony G., and Linda Hamilton Krieger. "Implicit bias: Scientific foundations." California law review 94.4 (2006): 945-967. doi:10.2307/20439056

Greenwald, Anthony G., and Mahzarin R. Banaji. "Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes." Psychological review 102.1 (1995): 4. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4

Hallahan, Kirk. "Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations." Journal of public relations research 11.3 (1999): 205-242. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1103_02

Hayes, Rebecca M., Katherine Lorenz, and Kristin A. Bell. "Victim blaming others: Rape myth acceptance and the just world belief." Feminist Criminology 8.3 (2013): 202-220. doi:10.1177/1557085113484788

Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness." Cognitive psychology 3.3 (1972): 430-454. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan, 2011, pp. 23, 145

Kang, Jerry. Implicit bias: A primer for courts. National Center for State Courts, 2009.

Koppel, Lina, et al. "No effect of ego depletion on risk taking." Scientific reports 9.1 (2019): 9724. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46103-0

Layman, Katherine E. "The representation of rape and sexual assault within news media." (2020). doi:10.15760/honors.872

Lerner, Melvin J., and Melvin J. Lerner. The belief in a just world. Springer US, 1980.

Lonsway, Kimberly A, and Joanne Archambault. “The "justice gap" for sexual assault cases: future directions for research and reform.” Violence against women vol. 18,2 (2012): 145-68. doi:10.1177/1077801212440017

McCraty, Rollin, and Mike Atkinson. "Resilience training program reduces physiological and psychological stress in police officers." Global advances in health and medicine 1.5 (2012): 44-66. doi:10.7453/gahmj.2012.1.5.013

Ostrander, Danielle. Police perceptions on false accusations of sexual assault. Diss. East Tennessee State University, 2018. doi:10.1080/09589236.2016.1194260

Pang, Yazhi, Kari Davies, and Yong Liu. "Changes in certitude, adherence, and attitude: immediate effects of rape myth intervention on jurors in a mock trial." International journal of environmental research and public health 19.16 (2022): 10345. doi:10.3390/ijerph191610345

Pattavina, April, Melissa Morabito, and Linda M. Williams. "Examining connections between the police and prosecution in sexual assault case processing: Does the use of exceptional clearance facilitate a downstream orientation?." Victims & Offenders 11.2 (2016): 315-334. doi:10.1080/15564886.2015.1046622

Patterson, Debra, and Rebecca Campbell. "The problem of untested sexual assault kits: why are some kits never submitted to a crime laboratory?." Journal of Interpersonal Violence 27.11 (2012): 2259-2275. doi:10.1177/0886260511432155

Payne, B. Keith, et al. "An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement." Journal of personality and social psychology 89.3 (2005): 277. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277

Pinkleton, Bruce E., et al. "Assessing effects of a media literacy-based intervention on US adolescents' responses to and interpretations of sexual media messages." Journal of Children and Media 7.4 (2013): 463-479. doi:10.1080/17482798.2013.781512

Reinhard, Marc‐André, Martin Scharmach, and Dagmar Stahlberg. "Too exhausted to see the truth: Ego depletion and the ability to detect deception." British Journal of Social Psychology 52.4 (2013): 618-630. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02113.x

Sacco, Lisa N., and Nathan James. Backlog of sexual assault evidence: In brief. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2015.

Schuller, Regina A., et al. "Judgments of sexual assault: The impact of complainant emotional demeanor, gender, and victim stereotypes." New Criminal Law Review 13.4 (2010): 759-780. doi:10.1525/nclr.2010.13.4.759

Shaw, Jessica et al. “The View from Inside the System: How Police Explain Their Response to Sexual Assault.” American journal of community psychology vol. 58,3-4 (2016): 446-462. doi:10.1002/ajcp.12096

Spanos, Nicholas P., Susan C. Dubreuil, and Maxwell I. Gwynn. "The effects of expert testimony concerning rape on the verdicts and beliefs of mock jurors." Imagination, Cognition and Personality 11.1 (1991): 37-51. doi:10.2190/0VFG-0DVL-TGQ8-BJFF

Steblay, Nancy Mehrkens, et al. "The effects of pretrial publicity on juror verdicts: A meta-analytic review." Law and Human Behavior 23 (1999): 219-235. doi:10.1023/A:1022325019080

Territo, Leonard, and Harold J. Vetter. Stress and police personnel. Boston, Mass.: Allyn and Bacon, 1981.

Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. "Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability." Cognitive psychology 5.2 (1973): 207-232. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9

Ullman, Sarah E. "Social reactions, coping strategies, and self‐blame attributions in adjustment to sexual assault." Psychology of women quarterly 20.4 (1996): 505-526. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00319.x

US Department of Justice. "Crime in the United States, 2010." (2010).

Venema, Rachel M. "Making judgments: How blame mediates the influence of rape myth acceptance in police response to sexual assault." Journal of Interpersonal Violence 34.13 (2019): 2697-2722. doi:10.1177/0886260516662437

Venema, Rachel M. "Police officer schema of sexual assault reports: Real rape, ambiguous cases, and false reports." Journal of interpersonal violence 31.5 (2016): 872-899. doi:10.1177/0886260514556765

Venema, Rachel M., Katherine Lorenz, and Nicole Sweda. "Unfounded, cleared, or cleared by exceptional means: Sexual assault case outcomes from 1999 to 2014." Journal of interpersonal violence 36.19-20 (2021): NP10688-NP10719. doi:10.1177/0886260519876718

Published

05-31-2023

How to Cite

Giri, N. (2023). Combatting Rape Myth Acceptance in United States’ Criminal Justice System with Behavioral Economics. Journal of Student Research, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i2.4357

Issue

Section

HS Review Articles