Why We Speak Up: The Effect of Preconceived Cause of Sexual Orientation on Heterosexual Engagement in the Homosexual Movement for Social Equality

Authors

  • Simran Goraya Plainview Old-Bethpage JFK High School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i2.4243

Keywords:

LGBT, Homosexuality, Activism, Allyship

Abstract

Despite the increasing societal acceptance of homosexual individuals, the perception of homosexuality by heterosexual individuals is polluted by personal bias. My study observed the interaction between 422 heterosexuals and the homosexual community. First, my subjects self reported their beliefs on the determinant of sexual orientation (genetic or lifestyle). Next, they took the Activism Orientation (AO) and Sexual Prejudice (SP) Scales as a baseline measure of their relationship with members homosexual community. Subjects were randomly assigned to listen to an interview of two fictional homosexual individuals that spoke of life experience which either supported or contradicted the subjects’ self reported beliefs. Additionally, subjects were assigned to a high or low empathy condition toward the interviewee. After listening to the interview, subjects were given the choice to allocate $0 - $8,000 in support of a pro - LGBT charity. Subjects then retook the AO and SP scales to measure for significant changes in perception of homsexuals after the fictional scenario. Results indicated a significant decrease in the AO of subjects that viewed interviews that contradicted their beliefs. Additionally, subjects assigned to the low empathy condition donated significantly larger amounts. The present study has two main implications: Heterosexual individuals’ generalize their advocacy toward the LGBT community based on the actions of a singular homosexual. Furthermore, many activists naturally approach issues regarding social justice from a place of empathy, it is more sustainable to approach social justice movements from a logical perspective to allow for more meaningful and long term participation in a social justice movement.



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References or Bibliography

Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1656-1666.

Berkowitz, A. (1992). College men as perpetrators of acquaintance rape and sexual assault: A review of recent research. Journal of American College Health, 40(4), 175-181.

Chonody, J. M. (2013). Measuring sexual prejudice against gay men and lesbian women: Development of the Sexual Prejudice Scale (SPS). Journal of homosexuality, 60(6), 895-926.

Corning, A. F., & Myers, D. J. (2002). Individual orientation toward engagement in social action. Political Psychology, 23(4), 703-729.

Dixon, J. C., & Rosenbaum, M. S. (2004). Nice to meet you. Testing contact, cultural, and group threat theories of anti‐Black and anti‐Hispanic stereotypes. Social Science Quarterly, 85(2), 257-280.

Fredriksen Goldsen, K. I. (2018). Shifting social context in the lives of homosexual older adults. Public Policy & Aging Report, 28(1), 24–28

Fredriksen Goldsen, K. I., Kim, H. J., Emlet, C., Muraco, A., Erosheva, E. A., Hoy-Ellis, C. P., et al. (2011). The Aging and health report: Disparities and resilience among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender older adults. Seattle: Institute for Multigenerational Health

Gorski, P. C. (2019). Fighting racism, battling burnout: Causes of activist burnout in US racial justice activists. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(5), 667-687.

Kosciw, J. G., Greytak, E. A., Giga, N. M., Villenas, C., & Danischewski, D. J. (2016). The 2015 National School Climate Survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer youth in our nation’s schools. New York: GLSEN.

Mckinlay, T., & Lavis, T. (2020). Why did she send it in the first place? Victim blame in the context of ‘revenge porn’. Psychiatry, psychology and law, 27(3), 386-396.

Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674

Miller, M. K., Clark, J. D., & Alvarez, M. J. (2020). Exploring the boundaries of societally acceptable bias expression toward Muslim and atheist defendants in four mock-juror experiments. The Social Science Journal, 1-36.

Morin, S. F., Charles, K. A., & Malyon, A. K. (1984). The psychological impact of AIDS on gay men. American Psychologist, 39(11), 1288.

Salerno, J. M., & Bottoms, B. L. (2009). Emotional evidence and jurors' judgments: The promise of neuroscience for informing psychology and law. Behavioral sciences & the law, 27(2), 273-296.

Scott, A. J., & Gavin, J. (2017). Revenge pornography: The influence of perpetrator-victim sex, observer sex and observer sexting experience on perceptions of seriousness and responsibility. Journal of criminal psychology.

Staub, E. (1974). Helping a distressed person: Social, personality, and stimulus determinants. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 293-341). Academic Press.

Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. Social psychology quarterly, 227-236.

Washington J, Evans NJ. Becoming an ally. In: Evans NJ, Wall VA, eds. Beyond Tolerance: Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals on Campus. Alexandria, VA: American College Personnel Association; 199 1 : 195-2 12

Published

05-31-2023

How to Cite

Goraya, S. (2023). Why We Speak Up: The Effect of Preconceived Cause of Sexual Orientation on Heterosexual Engagement in the Homosexual Movement for Social Equality. Journal of Student Research, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i2.4243

Issue

Section

HS Research Projects