The Presence of Political Parasocial Interaction in the Websites of U.S. Senators

Authors

  • Riddhima Patllollu Ridgewood High School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i1.3877

Keywords:

psychology, computer science, web development, website interface, user interface, user experience, parasocial activity, parasocial interaction, parasocial presence, U.S. Senate, political parasocial relationship, parasocial relationship

Abstract

The growing trend of parasocial activity in the digital age raises the question of its role in the relationship between website interface and website user, with specific regard to parasocial activity in politics and the implications of the former. To address this gap, I conducted a QUAL-QUAN content analysis on the campaign websites of each member of the U.S. Senate to identify trends in website interface design that may foster parasocial interaction. Consequently, I validated the findings of the content analysis through a qualitative comparative analysis that utilized accredited sources as a model for what constitutes parasocial interaction. My results were conclusive, with certain website components (call-to-action, social media content, biographical content, newsletter forms, and constituent services) appearing with significant frequency across all campaign websites. When compared with the models of the accredited sources, they revealed that the placement and content of these website components can be purposed to foster parasocial interaction between website interface and website user. However, the results may have been influenced by political bias or the errors of manual content analysis of various website components at a large scale. On a broader scope, this paper hopes to draw attention to a less commonly analyzed form of media, the website, in the field of research on parasocial activity. Furthermore, it may serve as a basis for reflection on the possible effects of the presence of political parasocial interaction on websites on the website user, and the United States’ political processes in an increasingly digital era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References or Bibliography

“About,” Senator John Hickenlooper, https://www.hickenlooper.senate.gov/about/.

www.cotton.senate.gov. “Home | U.S. Senator Cotton of Arkansas.” Accessed September 26, 2022. https://www.cotton.senate.gov/.

United States Senate. “Senators,” n.d. https://www.senate.gov/senators/index.htm.

Booker, Cory. “Cory Booker (@Corybooker) • Instagram Photos and Videos.” Instagram.com, 2013. https://www.instagram.com/corybooker/.

Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopedia. "persona," Encyclopedia Britannica, April 4, 2008. https://www.britannica.com/science/persona-psychology.

“Cory Booker on Instagram: ‘I Love Walking and Running around My Neighborhood, I Get to Connect with Folks Who Inform, Lift, and Even Challenge Me. These Women Were Just Awesome! #CoryStories.’” Instagram, May 18, 2022. https://www.instagram.com/reel/CduKpfUOLTx/?.

“Cory Booker on Instagram: ‘My Dad Loved This Story and Believed That One’s Past Doesn’t Determine One’s Future; We Do. #CoryStories.’” Instagram, May 18, 2022. https://www.instagram.com/reel/CdtVc_KLL1T/?.

Burgoon, Judee K., Charles R. Berger, and Vincent R. Waldron. “Mindfulness and Interpersonal Communication.” Journal of Social Issues 56, no. 1 (January 2000): 105–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00154.

Dennis, Alan R., Robert M. Fuller, and Joseph S. Valacich. “Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity.” MIS Quartlerly 32, no. 3 (September 2008): 575–600.

Dibble, Jayson L., Tilo Hartmann, and Sarah F. Rosaen. “Parasocial Interaction and Parasocial Relationship: Conceptual Clarification and a Critical Assessment of Measures.” Human Communication Research 42, no. 1 (March 17, 2016): 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12063.

Eckman, Sarah J. “Constituent Services: Overview and Resources.” Congressional Research Service, January 5, 2017. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R44726.pdf.

Frank, Allegra. “AOC Met More than 400,000 Young Potential Voters on Twitch.” Vox, October 22, 2020. https://www.vox.com/2020/10/22/21526625/.

Gabriel, Shira, Elaine Paravati, Melanie C. Green, and Jason Flomsbee. “From Apprentice to President.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 9, no. 3 (March 26, 2018): 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617722835.

Hakim, Moh Abdul, and James H. Liu. “Development, Construct Validity, and Measurement Invariance of the Parasocial Relationship with Political Figures (PSR-P) Scale.” International Perspectives in Psychology 10, no. 1 (January 2021): 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1027/2157-3891/a000002.

Horton, Donald, and R. Richard Wohl. “Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction.” Psychiatry 19, no. 3 (August 1956): 215–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049.

Kumar, Nanda, and Izak Benbasat. “Para-Social Presence and Communication Capabilities of a Web Site: A Theoretical Perspective.” E-Service Journal 1, no. 3 (2002): 5. https://doi.org/10.2979/esj.2002.1.3.5.

Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria. “Twitch.” Twitch, October 20, 2020. https://www.twitch.tv/videos/817942495?t=00h26m46s.

Ophir, Yotam, and Gabriel Weimann. “From Terrorist to Persona: Para-Social Interaction and the ETA Website.” Perspectives on Terrorism 6, no. 1 (January 2012). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261025454.

Ryfe, David Michael. “Franklin Roosevelt and the Fireside Chats.” Journal of Communication 49, no. 4 (December 1, 1999): 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02818.x.

Te’eni, Dov. “Review: A Cognitive-Affective Model of Organizational Communication for Designing IT.” MIS Quarterly 25, no. 2 (June 2001): 251. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250931.

Trevino, Linda Klebe, Robert H. Lengel, and Richard L. Daft. “Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations.” Communication Research 14, no. 5 (October 1987): 553–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365087014005006.

Tsfati, Yariv, Jonathan Cohen, Shira Dvir-Gvirsman, Keren Tsuriel, Israel Waismel-Manor, and R. Lance Holbert. “Political Para-Social Relationship as a Predictor of Voting Preferences in the Israeli 2019 Elections.” Communication Research, July 30, 2021, 009365022110328. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211032822.

Weiner, Amanda. “Most Essential Parts of a Website.” Wix Blog, March 23, 2021. https://www.wix.com/blog/2021/03/parts-of-a-website/.

Westen, Drew. The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation. New York: Public Affairs, 2007.

Guzman Centeno, Dave de. “Parasociality and Habitus in Celebrity Consumption and Political Culture: A Philippine Case Study.” Asian Journal of Social Science 44, no. 4/5 (2016): 441–84. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685314-04404002.

Kessel, Patrick van, Pew Research Center, Regina Widjaya, Sono Shah, Aaron Smith, and Adam Hughes. “Congress Soars to New Heights on Social Media.” Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech, July 16, 2020. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/07/16/.

Published

02-28-2023

How to Cite

Patllollu, R. (2023). The Presence of Political Parasocial Interaction in the Websites of U.S. Senators. Journal of Student Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i1.3877

Issue

Section

AP Capstone™ Research