Identifying Factors Influencing Investor Behavior in the Stock Market

Authors

  • Jonathan Hartanto College Impact
  • Dr. Stuart A. Meyers, Ed.D

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i3.3701

Keywords:

Behavioral Finance, Overconfidence, Anchoring, Disposition Effect, Herding, Familiarity, Mental Accounting, Investor Behavior, Investor Biases, Qualitatative Research

Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative study is to compare and contrast various factors influencing individual investor behavior in the stock market as detailed in surveys and interviews conducted in Sri Lanka, Nigeria, Vietnam, and Pakistan. The aim is to determine whether behavioral biases are consistent or vary depending on regional context, and if so, what determines the presence or expression of some biases over others. Searches were conducted and the conclusions from the four studies were extracted and comparatively analyzed. The findings indicate that investors are most likely to experience overconfidence above any other behavioral bias, and that the biases seen in the different markets were largely in agreement. Unique regional attributes, such as culture were identified and analyzed as potential influences on the relative presence or absence of behavioral biases, including overconfidence and herding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References or Bibliography

Babajide, A., & Adetiloye, K. (2012). Investors' Behavioral Biases and the Security Market: An Empirical Study of the Nigerian Security Market. Accounting and Finance Research, 1(1), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v1n1p219

Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556400

Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2013). The behavior of individual investors. In Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Vol. 2, pp. 1533–1570). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-44-459406-8.00022-6

Barberis, N., & Huang, M. (2001). Mental accounting, loss aversion, and individual stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 56(4), 1247–1292. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00367

Baxter, P. & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573

Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486

Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian & New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 36(6), 717–732. https://doi.org/10.1046%2Fj.1440-1614.2002.01100.x

Hsee, C. K., & Weber, E. U. (1999). Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199906)12:2%3C165::AID-BDM316%3E3.0.CO;2-N

Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

Katper, N., Azam, M., Karim, N., & Zia, S. (2019). Behavioral biases and investors’ decision-making: The moderating role of socio-demographic variables. International Journal of Financial Engineering, 6(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424786319500208

Kengatharan, L., & Kengatharan, N. (2014). The influence of behavioral factors in making investment decisions and performance: Study on investors of Colombo Stock Exchange, Sri Lanka. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 6(1), 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v6i1.4893

Kumar, S., & Goyal, N. (2015). Behavioural biases in investment decision making – a systematic literature review. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 7(1), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-07-2014-0022

Luong, L. P., & Ha, D. T. (2011). Behavioral factors influencing individual investors' decision making and performance: A survey at the Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange. Vietnam: Umea School of Business.

Malkiel, B. G. (2003). The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 59–82. http://doi.org/10.1257/089533003321164958

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

Yates, J. F., Lee, J. W., & Shinotsuka, H. (1996). Beliefs about overconfidence, including its cross-national variation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(2), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0012

Published

08-31-2022

How to Cite

Hartanto, J., & Meyers, S. (2022). Identifying Factors Influencing Investor Behavior in the Stock Market. Journal of Student Research, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i3.3701

Issue

Section

HS Research Projects