Analyzing COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the United States and Possible Mitigations Through the Lens of Behavioral Economics

Authors

  • Avanthi Krishnan Montville Township High School
  • Dr. Edoardo Gallo Horizon Academic Research Program

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i4.3687

Keywords:

COVID-19, Vaccine Hesitancy, United States, Behavioral Economics

Abstract

During the current pandemic, vaccine hesitation is rapidly spreading through social media controversies. Despite the reassurance of medical professionals, heuristics from behavioral economics impose irrational thinking that leads to false interpretations of the news. This research paper analyzes the effect heuristics have on COVID-19 vaccination rates in the United States through a series of experiments and data analysis. Specifically, I will define confirmation bias, risk perception, availability bias, and status quo bias, and thoroughly discuss their relation to decision making. This paper also strives to explore framing and loss aversion among different age groups and provide refined, age-specific policies that the government can incorporate to increase vaccinations in America.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References or Bibliography

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). CDC Covid Data tracker. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved February 21, 2022, from https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker

Saleska, J. L., & Choi, K. R. (2021, March 25). Behavioral economics perspective on the COVID-19 vaccine amid public mistrust. OUP Academic. Retrieved February 21, 2022, from https://academic.oup.com/tbm/article/11/3/821/6187487.

Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013.

-4-6 problem. Oxford Reference. (n.d.). Retrieved February 21, 2022, from https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100347298

Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-won. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.211

Modgil, S., Singh, R. K., Gupta, S., & Dennehy, D. (2021, November 20). A confirmation bias view on social media induced polarisation during COVID-19 - Information Systems Frontiers. SpringerLink. Retrieved February 21, 2022, from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10796-021-10222-9

Alvernia University. (2019, April 4). Group polarization in Social Psychology. Alvernia Online. Retrieved February 21, 2022, from https://online.alvernia.edu/articles/group-polarization-social-psychology

Ruiz, J. B., & Bell, R. A. (2021). Predictors of intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: Results of a nationwide survey. Vaccine, 39(7), 1080–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.01.010

Faia, E., Fuster, A., Pezone, V., & Zafar, B. (2021). Biases in information selection and processing: Survey evidence from the pandemic. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28484

Bureau, U. S. C. (2021, December 28). Household pulse survey shows many don't trust COVID vaccine, worry about side effects. Census.gov. Retrieved February 21, 2022, from https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/12/who-are-the-adults-not-vaccinated-against-covid.html

Paek, H.-J., & Hove, T. (2017, March 29). Risk perceptions and risk characteristics. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Retrieved February 21, 2022, from https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-283

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9

Kelen, G. & Maragakis, L. Covid-19 vaccines: Myth versus fact. Johns Hopkins Medicine. (n.d.). Retrieved February 21, 2022, from https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/covid-19-vaccines-myth-versus-fact

Azarpanah, H., Farhadloo, M., Vahidov, R., & Pilote, L. (2021). Vaccine hesitancy: Evidence from an adverse events following immunization database, and the role of cognitive biases. BMC Public Health, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11745-1

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Selected adverse events reported after COVID-19 vaccination. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved February 21, 2022, from https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html

Abel, M., Byker, T., & Carpenter, J. P. (2020). Socially optimal mistakes? Debiasing Covid-19 mortality risk perceptions and prosocial behavior. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3669489

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00055564

Suri, G., Sheppes, G., Schwartz, C., & Gross, J. J. (2013). Patient inertia and the status quo bias. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1763–1769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613479976

Framing effect. Oxford Reference. (n.d.). Retrieved February 21, 2022, from https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095832183

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683

Reinhardt, A., & Rossmann, C. (2021). Age-related framing effects: Why vaccination against covid-19 should be promoted differently in younger and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 27(4), 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000378

Crandall, C. S., Eidelman, S., Skitka, L. J., & Morgan, G. S. (2009). Status quo framing increases support for torture. Social Influence, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510802124397

Vaccines. Pfizer. (n.d.). Retrieved February 21, 2022, from https://www.pfizer.com/partners/candidate/vaccines

Ellis, R. (2021, November 25). Unvaccinated 14 times more likely to die from covid. WebMD. Retrieved February 21, 2022, from https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid-19-vaccine/news/20211124/unvaccinated-14-times-more-likely-to-die-from-covid

Status quo bias - biases & heuristics. The Decision Lab. (2021, September 30). Retrieved February 22, 2022, from https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/status-quo-bias

Published

11-30-2022

How to Cite

Krishnan, A., & Gallo, E. (2022). Analyzing COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the United States and Possible Mitigations Through the Lens of Behavioral Economics. Journal of Student Research, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i4.3687

Issue

Section

HS Research Projects