Public Healthcare Policies for the Elderly in the United States: Suggestions from a Comparison between South Korea and the United States

Authors

  • Jooyoung Choi Chadwick International School
  • Deepon Bhaumik

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i4.3650

Keywords:

health policy, long-term care, elderly

Abstract

As the aging population percentage rapidly increases across the world, leading to an increase in the necessity of long-term care, it is crucial for the government of the United States to implement changes to create more sustainable, and sufficient programs. This policy brief intends to identify problems in the current United States long-term health care system, and will try to find a possible suggestion to impede the gaps in the system. To bring a direct comparison and possible solutions, this brief will also investigate South Korea, a country with similar aging demographics and economic development as the United States. South Korea ranks 10th in GDP, and the elderly population comprise of 17.5% of the entire population (compared to 16% for the U.S). The South Korean examples of the policy suggest a few practical solutions to the issue, such as an increase in basing long term care eligibility on health status of an individual, rather than an emphasis on income eligibility. Targeted policies such as South Korea’s Alzheimer detection program should be more widely utilized for most chronic diseases in the United States. These types of prevention services will be able to help decrease the total amount of funding spent on these patients. Learning from South Korea’s policies can provide the U.S. with services that can adequately address the elderly population’s need for assistance and care.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References or Bibliography

“Projected Future Growth of Older Population.” ACL Administration for Community Living, acl.gov/aging-and-disability-in-america/data-and-research/projected-future-growth-older-population#:~:text=Bo th%20populations%20are%20growing%2C%20and,3.1%20million%20to%2054.1%20million).

Mitchell, Susan L., et al. “Long-Term Care in the United States - Problems and Solutions: Nejm.” New England Journal of Medicine, 19 May 2022, www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2201377

“The Economic Impact of Caregiving.” Blue Cross Blue Shield, www.bcbs.com/the-health-of-america/reports/the-economic-impact-of-caregiving#:~:text=The%20estimated%2 0indirect%20economic%20effect,from%20absenteeism%20issues%20at%20work

Malato, Daniel. “Long-Term Care in America: Expectations and Reality.” The Long-Term Care Poll, 30 Mar. 2018, www.longtermcarepoll.org/report-long-term-care-in-america-expectations-and-reality.

Yonhap. “16.5% of S. Korea’s Population Aged 65 and Older in 2021: Report - the Korea Herald.” The Korea Herald, The Korea Herald, 29 Sept. 2021, www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20210929000712.

“Medicare.” KFF, 20 Sept. 2019, www.kff.org/medicare/.

“Medicaid.” KFF, 20 Sept. 2019, www.kff.org/medicaid/.

“Medicaid Eligibility: 2022 Income, Asset & Care Requirements for Nursing Homes & Long-Term Care.” Medicaid Planning Assistance, www.medicaidplanningassistance.org/medicaid-eligibility/?__cf_chl_rt_tk=TBIriCL.VZJisXvY.3AeADQ8mRN xuwugys0.UsW8Bjc-1661275502-0-gaNycGzNCNE.

“Medicaid – Adults 65 and Older & People with Disabilities.” Economic Progress Institute, www.economicprogressri.org/index.php/medicaid-adults-65-and-older-people-with-disabilities/#:~:text=The%2 0Medicaid%20program%20provides%20comprehensive,SSI%20benefits%20automatically%20receive%20Med icaid.

King, Robert. “Urban Institute Study: Medicare Cost Cap Boosts Affordability and May Lower Medigap Premiums.” Fierce Healthcare, 8 June 2022, www.fiercehealthcare.com/payers/urban-institute-study-medicare-cost-cap-boosts-affordability-and-may-lower- medigap-premiums.

“Pace.” Medicare, www.medicare.gov/your-medicare-costs/get-help-paying-costs/pace

Wilensky, Gail. “The next 50 Years for Medicare and Medicaid.” The New York Times, The New York Times, www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/07/30/the-next-50-years-for-medicare-and-medicaid/medicare-and-medi caid-are-unsustainable-without-quick-action

“국민건강보험.” 국민건강보험공단 장기요양보험, www.longtermcare.or.kr/npbs/e/b/101/npeb101m01.web?menuId=npe0000000030&zoomSize

“노인요양보험제도.” 보건복지부, www.mohw.go.kr/react/policy/index.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=06&MENU_ID=06390301&PAGE=1&topTitle=

Eun-Kyoung Lee. "현안분석 : 우리나라 건강보험제도에 관한 고찰." Monthly Public Finance Forum, 167.0 (2010): 32-46.

“요양보험제도.” 보건복지부, www.mohw.go.kr/react/policy/index.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=06&MENU_ID=06390301&PAGE=1&topTitle=

“Gate News 지속가능하지 않고 의료의 질을 떨어트리는 건강보험 저(底)부담 정책.” MEDI, www.medigatenews.com/news/2117379198

Ahn, Myung-Sun, and Joo-Hyun Park. “A Study on the Problems and Improvement of Long-Term Care Insurance for the Elderly.” The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, vol. 19, no. 8, 한국콘텐츠학회, Aug. 2019, pp. 525–534, doi:10.5392/JKCA.2019.19.08.525.

Published

11-30-2022

How to Cite

Choi, J., & Bhaumik, D. (2022). Public Healthcare Policies for the Elderly in the United States: Suggestions from a Comparison between South Korea and the United States. Journal of Student Research, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i4.3650

Issue

Section

HS Research Articles