Inquiry Into Which Area of the Life Extension Debate is Most Effective in Changing Attitudes Towards it Among 16 to 17 Year-Olds

Authors

  • Cassandra Temple ACS Cobham International School
  • Dr. Mair Underwood Mentor, The University of Queensland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i3.2115

Keywords:

Attitudes, Life Extension, 16-17 Year Olds, Life Extension Debate

Abstract

Existing research extension has yielded varying results about whether the public’s attitudes towards life extension are positive or negative. Such differences could be accounted for by factors such as general attitudes towards developments in science and technology and exposure to fiction (such as books or movies) which generally portray life extension in an unfavorable light. This study revealed that, at least among 16 to 17 year-old High School Juniors, there was a correlation between a favorable orientation towards scientific and technological developments and positive attitudes towards life extension. Additionally, participants who had witnessed representation of life extension in fiction were less likely to hold positive attitudes towards it. The specification of the physical state in which people would live an extended lifespan in was also found to be significant in forming attitudes towards life extension. The main positive arguments about life extension were cited to be having more time, being able to be with loved ones longer, and it being beneficial towards society and humanity. However, the most significant negative arguments were that overpopulation would become a severe issue, outliving loved ones would be distressing, and abuse of power. In an attempt to change attitudes towards life extension from negative to positive, a 15-minute presentation about either the social and personal, ethical, or scientific aspect was generally ineffective in doing so. However, out of the favorable change that did occur, the presentation on the scientific feasibility of life extension was found to be the most effective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References or Bibliography

Alvarez, A., Mendoza, L., & Danielson, P. (2015). Mixed views about radical life extension. Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 9(1). doi:10.5324/eip.v9i1.1829

Arber, S., Vandrevala, T., Daly, T., & Hampson, S. (2008). Understanding gender differences in older people's attitudes towards life-prolonging medical technologies. Journal of Aging Studies, 22(4), 366-375. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2008.05.009

Burials. Fieldwork Dates: 7th – 8th November 2018. Conducted by YouGov. On behalf of YouGov Omnibus.

Calnan, M., Montaner, D., & Horne, R. (2005). How acceptable are innovative health-care technologies? A survey of public beliefs and attitudes in England and Wales. Social Science & Medicine, 60(9), 1937-1948. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.058

Cicirelli, V. G. (2011). Elders' attitudes toward extending the healthy life span. Journal of Aging Studies, 25(2), 84-93. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2010.08.011Donner, Y., Fortney, K., Calimport, S. R., Pfleger, K., Shah, M., & Betts-LaCroix, J. (2016). Great desire for extended life and Health amongst the American public. Frontiers in Genetics, 6. doi:10.3389/fgene.2015.00353

Dragojlovic, N. (2013). Canadians' support for radical life extension resulting fromadvances in regenerative medicine. Journal of Aging Studies, 27(2), 151-158. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2012.12.008

Duncan, D. (2012, August 25). How long do you want to live? Retrieved April 26, 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/26/sunday-review/how-long-do-you-want-to-live.html

Fahy, G. M., West, M. D., Coles, L. S., & Harris, S. B. (2010). The future of aging pathways to human life extension. New York: Springer.

Harris, M. B., Walters, L. C., & Waschull, S. (1991). Altering attitudes and knowledge about obesity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131(6), 881-884. doi:10.1080/00224545.1991.9924675

Juengst, E. T. (2003). AGING: Enhanced: Antiaging research and the need for public dialogue. Science, 299(5611), 1323-1323. doi:10.1126/science.1083135

Lang, F. R., Baltes, P. B., & Wagner, G. G. (2007). Desired lifetime and End-of-Life Desires Across adulthood from 20 to 90: A dual-source information model. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 62(5). doi:10.1093/geronb/62.5.p268

Lee, Y., Shin, S., & Greiner, P. A. (2015). Can education change attitudes toward aging? A quasi-experimental design with a comparison group. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 5(9). doi:10.5430/jnep.v5n9p90

Living to 120 and Beyond: Americans’' views on aging, medical advances and radical life extension. (2020, May 30). Retrieved April 26, 2021, from https://www.pewforum.org/2013/08/06/living-to-120-and-beyond-americans-views-on-aging-medical-advances-and-radical-life-extension/

Moody, H. R. (winter 2001/2002). Who's afraid of life extension? Generations, 25(4), 33-37.

Partridge, B., & Hall, W. (2007). The search for Methuselah. Should we endeavour to increase the maximum human lifespan? EMBO Reports, 8(10), 888-891. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401069

Partridge, B., Lucke, J., Bartlett, H., & Hall, W. (2009). Ethical, social, and personal implications of extended human Lifespan identified by members of the public. Rejuvenation Research, 12(5), 351-357. doi:10.1089/rej.2009.0907

Partridge, B., Lucke, J., Bartlett, H., & Hall, W. (2011). Public attitudes towards human life extension by intervening in ageing. Journal of Aging Studies, 25(2), 73-83. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2010.08.012

Partridge, B., Underwood, M., Lucke, J., Bartlett, H., & Hall, W. (2009). Ethical concerns in the community about technologies to extend human life span. The American Journal of Bioethics, 9(12), 68-76. doi:10.1080/15265160903318368

Rose, K. A., & Ayad, S. (2008). Factors associated with changes in knowledge and attitude towards public health concepts among chiropractic college students enrolled in a community health class. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 22(2), 127-137. doi:10.7899/1042-5055-22.2.127

Shepherd, R., Barnett, J., Cooper, H., Coyle, A., Moran-Ellis, J., Senior, V., & Walton,C. (2007). Towards an understanding of British public attitudes concerning human cloning. Social Science & Medicine, 65(2), 377-392. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.018

Shepherd, R., Barnett, J., Cooper, H., Coyle, A., Moran-Ellis, J., Senior, V., & Walton, C. (2007). Towards an understanding of British public attitudes concerning human cloning. Social Science & Medicine, 65(2), 377-392. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.018

Underwood, M. (2014). What reassurances do the community need regarding life extension? Evidence from studies of community attitudes and an analysis of film portrayals. Rejuvenation Research, 17(2), 105-115. doi:10.1089/rej.2013.1479

Wareham, C. S. (2020). Genome editing for longer lives: The problem of loneliness. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 17(2), 309-314. doi:10.1007/s11673-020-09967-w

Zhu, X., & Xie, X. (2015). Effects of knowledge on attitude formation and change toward genetically modified foods. Risk Analysis, 35(5), 790-810. doi:10.1111/risa.12319

Published

11-28-2021

How to Cite

Temple, C., & Underwood, M. (2021). Inquiry Into Which Area of the Life Extension Debate is Most Effective in Changing Attitudes Towards it Among 16 to 17 Year-Olds. Journal of Student Research, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i3.2115

Issue

Section

AP Capstone™ Research