Dienogest Derivatives Show Increased Selectivity to the Progesterone Receptor

Authors

  • Jiya Bhatia Polygence Research Progrram
  • Jessica Jimenez The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Curriculum in Toxicology & Environmental Medicine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i4.1979

Keywords:

Birth control pill, Birth control pill side effects, Dienogest, Binding Affinity, Progesterone Receptor, Steroid Receptors

Abstract

Progestin, the synthetic progesterone in the combination birth control pill, functions to prevent pregnancy. Unfortunately, it also results in a wide range of side effects associated with the pill, including nausea, headaches, abdominal cramping, breakthrough bleeding, and mood changes. These side effects are due to the interactions that take place when the progestin binds not only to its desired target, the progesterone receptor, but also to other steroid receptors, namely the androgen receptor, estrogen receptor, glucocorticoid receptor, and mineralocorticoid receptor. In hopes of diminishing these side effects, in this study, one progestin, dienogest, was computationally altered to improve binding to the progesterone receptor while minimizing the binding to other receptors. The most successful derivative created involved the addition of a methyl and a methylene group, which significantly decreased binding to the five other receptors while maintaining a similar affinity for the progesterone receptor. Importantly, in an assessment of the social aspect of the birth control pill via an online survey released in the San Francisco Bay Area (n=73), the side effects of the birth control pill, which could be improved by minimizing off target interactions, are a major concern among women who consider this form of contraception.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jessica Jimenez, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Curriculum in Toxicology & Environmental Medicine

Mentor

References or Bibliography

(1) Speroff, L.; Darney, P. D. A Clinical Guide for Contraception; 2011.

(2) Apgar, B. S.; Greenberg, G. Using Progestins in Clinical Practice. Am. Fam. Physician 2000, 62 (8), 1839–1846, 1849–1850.

(3) Cooper, D. B.; Mahdy, H. Oral Contraceptive Pills. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island (FL), 2021.

(4) Gebel Berg, E. The Chemistry of the Pill. ACS Cent. Sci. 2015, 1 (1), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.5b00066.

(5) Goldfield, N.; Neinstein, L. Patient Understanding of Oral Contraceptive Side Effects. West. J. Med. 1985, 142 (3), 417–418.

(6) Pérez-Campos, E. F. Ethinylestradiol/Dienogest in Oral Contraception. Drugs 2010, 70 (6), 681–689. https://doi.org/10.2165/11536320-000000000-00000.

(7) Nelson, A. New Developments in Oral Contraception: Clinical Utility of Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia®) for Contraception and for Treatment of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: Patient Considerations. Open Access J. Contracept. 2012, 49. https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S26225.

(8) Hanwell, M. D.; Curtis, D. E.; Lonie, D. C.; Vandermeersch, T.; Zurek, E.; Hutchison, G. R. Avogadro: An Advanced Semantic Chemical Editor, Visualization, and Analysis Platform. J. Cheminformatics 2012, 4 (1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-4-17.

(9) Neese, F.; Wennmohs, F.; Becker, U.; Riplinger, C. The ORCA Quantum Chemistry Program Package. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152 (22), 224108. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0004608.

(10) Bitencourt-Ferreira, G.; Pintro, V. O.; de Azevedo, W. F. Docking with AutoDock4. In Docking Screens for Drug Discovery; de Azevedo Jr., W. F., Ed.; Methods in Molecular Biology; Springer: New York, NY, 2019; pp 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9752-7_9.

(11) Wilks, J. M.; Spilman, C. H.; Allan Campbell, J. Steroid Binding Specificity of the Hamster Uterine Progesterone Receptor. Steroids 1980, 35 (6), 697–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-128X(80)90094-X.

(12) Cabeza, M.; Heuze, Y.; Sánchez, A.; Garrido, M.; Bratoeff, E. Recent Advances in Structure of Progestins and Their Binding to Progesterone Receptors. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2015, 30 (1), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.3109/14756366.2014.895719.

(13) Kloosterboer, H. J.; Vonk-Noordegraaf, C. A.; Turpijn, E. W. Selectivity in Progesterone and Androgen Receptor Binding of Progestagens Used in Oral Contraceptives. Contraception 1988, 38 (3), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-7824(88)90104-7.

(14) Binding of steroids to progesterone receptor proteins in chick oviduct and human uterus - PubMed https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4369808/ (accessed 2021 -07 -16).

(15) Reed, J.; England, P.; Littlejohn, K.; Bass, B. C.; Caudillo, M. L. Consistent and Inconsistent Contraception among Young Women: Insights from Qualitative Interviews. Fam. Relat. 2014, 63 (2), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12058.

(16) Littlejohn, K. E. Hormonal Contraceptive Use and Discontinuation Because of Dissatisfaction: Differences by Race and Education. Demography 2012, 49 (4), 1433–1452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0127-7.

(17) Jones, R. K. Beyond Birth Control: The Overlooked Benefits Of Oral Contraceptive Pills. 9.

(18) Szucs, L. E.; Lowry, R.; Fasula, A. M.; Pampati, S.; Copen, C. E.; Hussaini, K. S.; Kachur, R. E.; Koumans, E. H.; Steiner, R. J. Condom and Contraceptive Use Among Sexually Active High School Students — Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2019. MMWR Suppl. 2020, 69 (1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.su6901a2.

Published

11-30-2021

How to Cite

Bhatia, J., & Jimenez, J. (2021). Dienogest Derivatives Show Increased Selectivity to the Progesterone Receptor. Journal of Student Research, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i4.1979

Issue

Section

HS Research Articles