Why We Must Raise the Age of Juveniles: A Scientific Review

Authors

  • Avital Mintz Trinity School
  • Julian Day-Cooney Mentor, Trinity School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i3.1869

Keywords:

juvenile justice, adolescent development

Abstract

Since 1971, the age at which people are no longer considered juveniles in the eyes of the law has been 18 years old. However, given that 18–25-year-olds have the highest rate of crime of all age groups, it is clear that prison is not working well to prevent future crimes of this specific group; The system in place is failing these ages. Neuroscience evidence has proven that the brain is still maturing after 18 years-old, especially in brain regions related to criminal behavior and instincts. In this paper, using evidence from neuroscience, I propose that the age of adulthood in the courtroom must be revised to reflect new discoveries in brain science.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References or Bibliography

Kristin C. Thompson and Richard J. Morris, Juvenile Delinquency and Disability, Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29343-1.

Samuel Lorenzo Knapp, The Life of Thomas Eddy: Comprising an Extensive Correspondence with Many of the Most Distinguished Philosophers and Philanthropists of This and Other Countries (Conner & Cooke, 1834).

Bradford Kinney Peirce, A Half Century with Juvenile Delinquents: Or, The New York House of Refuge and Its Times (D. Appleton, 1869).

Anne Meis Knupfer, Reform and Resistance: Gender, Delinquency, and America’s First Juvenile Court (Psychology Press, 2001).

Heyang Julie Kae, “Juvenile States: A Genealogy of Race, Gender and Delinquency in U.S. Culture, 1899-1967” (Thesis, 2014), https://digital.lib.washington.edu:443/researchworks/handle/1773/26694.

PAUL ALLEN BECK and M. KENT JENNINGS, “LOWERING THE VOTING AGE: THE CASE OF THE RELUCTANT ELECTORATE*,” Public Opinion Quarterly 33, no. 3 (January 1, 1969): 370–79, https://doi.org/10.1086/267720.

Neelum Arya, “Jailing Juveniles: The Dangers of Incarcerating Youth in Adult Jails in America,” November 1, 2007.

Vinnie Giordano, “Florida Has Work to Do to Treat African American Youth Fairly,” Juvenile Justice Information Exchange, December 4, 2019, https://jjie.org/2019/12/04/florida-has-work- to-do-to-treat-african-american-youth-fairly/.

Lisa S. Yun, “The United States Stands Alone: An International Consensus Against Juvenile Life without Parole Sentences,” Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 20 (2011 2010): 727.

“Eighth Amendment,” LII / Legal Information Institute, accessed March 8, 2021, https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/eighth_amendment.

Betsy J. Grey, Neuroscience and Emotional Harm in Tort Law: Rethinking the American Approach to Free-Standing Emotional Distress Claims, Law and Neuroscience (Oxford University Press), accessed March 14, 2021,

https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599844.001.000 1/acprof-9780199599844-chapter-12.

Jay D Aronson, “Neuroscience and Juvenile Justice,” Akron Law Review 42 (2009): 15.

Roper v. Simmons (Syllabus), 543 U.S. 551 (U.S. Supreme Court 2005).

Atkins v. Virginia (Syllabus), 536 U.S. 304 (U.S. Supreme Court 2002).

Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S.

“Roper v. Simmons Resource Page,” Death Penalty Information Center, accessed March 8, 2021, https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/facts-and-research/united-states-supreme-court/significant- supreme-court-opinions/roper-v-simmons-resource-page.

“Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010),” Justia Law, accessed March 8, 2021, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/560/48/.

Mary E Berkheiser, “Death Is Not So Different After All: Graham v. Florida and the Court’s ‘Kids Are Different’ Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence,” Vermont Law Review 36 (n.d.): 63.

Terrance Jamar Graham, “Supreme Court of the United States,” n.d., 54.

Justice Kennedy, Graham v. Florida ( Justice Kennedy , Opinion of the Court ), U.S. (U.S. Supreme Court 2010).

“Walking the Line: Tracing the Science of Miller v. Alabama in State Appellate Opinions | Syracuse Journal of Law & Civic Engagement,” accessed March 8, 2021, https://slace.syr.edu/walking-the-line-tracing-the-science-of-milner-v-alabama-in-state-appellate- opinions/.

“Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012),” Justia Law, accessed March 8, 2021, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/567/460/.j

“United States v. Tsarnaev, No. 16-6001 (1st Cir. 2020),” Justia Law, accessed March 8, 2021, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca1/16-6001/16-6001-2020-07- 31.html.

“United States v. Tsarnaev, No. 16-6001 (1st Cir. 2020).”

J Arnett, “Reckless Behavior in Adolescence: A Developmental Perspective,” Developmental Review 12, no. 4 (December 1992): 339–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90013-R.

Graham, “Supreme Court of the United States.”

Graham.

D. Knoch and E. Fehr, “Resisting the Power of Temptations: The Right Prefrontal Cortex and Self-Control,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1104, no. 1 (April 13, 2007): 123– 34, https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1390.004.

“Impulse Control Comes Late for Teens,” Futurity (blog), October 12, 2009, https://www.futurity.org/impulse-control-comes-late-for-teens/.

“Impulse Control Comes Late for Teens.”

Luna, Beatriz, Aarthi Padmanabhan, and Kirsten O’Hearn. “What Has FMRI Told Us about the Development of Cognitive Control through Adolescence?” Brain and Cognition 72, no. 1 (February 2010): 101–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.08.005

Sakai, Jill. “Core Concept: How Synaptic Pruning Shapes Neural Wiring during Development and, Possibly, in Disease.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, no. 28 (July 14, 2020): 16096–99. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010281117.

Anthony A. Mercadante and Prasanna Tadi, “Neuroanatomy, Gray Matter,” in StatPearls (Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2021), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553239/.

Efstathios D. Gennatas et al., “Age-Related Effects and Sex Differences in Gray Matter Density, Volume, Mass, and Cortical Thickness from Childhood to Young Adulthood,” The Journal of Neuroscience 37, no. 20 (May 17, 2017): 5065–73, https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3550-16.2017.

Sang Soo Cho et al., “Morphometric Correlation of Impulsivity in Medial Prefrontal Cortex,” Brain Topography 26, no. 3 (July 2013): 479–87, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-012-0270-x. [36] “Teenage Brain Development and Criminal Behavior,” Crime Traveller (blog), June 16, 2015, https://www.crimetraveller.org/2015/06/teenage-brain-development/.

“White Matter in Learning, Cognition and Psychiatric Disorders - ScienceDirect,” accessed March 14, 2021, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016622360800132X. [38] Christian K. Tamnes et al., “Brain Maturation in Adolescence and Young Adulthood: Regional Age-Related Changes in Cortical Thickness and White Matter Volume and Microstructure,” Cerebral Cortex 20, no. 3 (March 2010): 534–48, https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp118.

Lauren J. O’Donnell and Carl-Fredrik Westin, “An Introduction to Diffusion Tensor Image Analysis,” Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 22, no. 2 (April 2011): 185–viii, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2010.12.004.

Johnna R. Swartz et al., “Age-Related Changes in the Structure and Function of Prefrontal Cortex–Amygdala Circuitry in Children and Adolescents: A Multi-Modal Imaging Approach,” NeuroImage 86 (February 2014): 212–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.018.

Ralph Adolphs, “The Human Amygdala and Emotion,” The Neuroscientist 5, no. 2 (March 1, 1999): 125–37, https://doi.org/10.1177/107385849900500216.

R. Adolphs et al., “Fear and the Human Amygdala,” The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 15, no. 9 (September 1995): 5879–91.

Knoch and Fehr, “Resisting the Power of Temptations.”

Dylan G. Gee et al., “A Developmental Shift from Positive to Negative Connectivity in Human Amygdala–Prefrontal Circuitry,” The Journal of Neuroscience 33, no. 10 (March 6, 2013): 4584–93, https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3446-12.2013.

Swartz et al., “Age-Related Changes in the Structure and Function of Prefrontal Cortex– Amygdala Circuitry in Children and Adolescents.”

Sarah J. Banks et al., “Amygdala–Frontal Connectivity during Emotion Regulation,” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2, no. 4 (December 1, 2007): 303–12, https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsm029.

Gee et al., “A Developmental Shift from Positive to Negative Connectivity in Human Amygdala–Prefrontal Circuitry.”

Jill X. O’Reilly et al., “Tools of the Trade: Psychophysiological Interactions and Functional Connectivity,” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 7, no. 5 (June 2012): 604–9, https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss055.

Christine E Fitch, “Emerging Adulthood and the Criminal Justice System: #Brainnotfullycooked #Can’tadultyet #Yolo,” SANTA CLARA LAW REVIEW 58 (n.d.): 20. [50] Fitch.

Mark W. Lipsey et al., “Effective Intervention for Serious Juvenile Offenders.: (306462003- 001)” (American Psychological Association, 2000), https://doi.org/10.1037/e306462003-001. [52] “KEY FACTS: YOUTH IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM,” n.d., 13.

Published

11-02-2021

How to Cite

Mintz, A., & Day-Cooney, J. (2021). Why We Must Raise the Age of Juveniles: A Scientific Review. Journal of Student Research, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i3.1869

Issue

Section

HS Review Articles