Implicit Learning of Motor Behavior Through Observation in Middle-School Students

Authors

  • Nayeric Cairo Pinecrest Preparatory Middle High School
  • Janette Sierra Pinecrest Preparatory High School
  • Maryam Vaziri Pashkam National Institue of Health

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i2.1710

Keywords:

observational learning, implicit learning, neutral parameter procedure, start-rotation principle

Abstract

There is a disagreement in the neuropsychological literature regarding the nature of observational learning, strictly without a motor component. While some studies claim explicit influences are needed in order for learning to occur, others argue that they are not. The current student aims at understanding this gap, in particular emphasizing the observation aspect, since there is a limited number of research on this component. An experiment was conducted to measure both the short- and long-term of this effect using a neutral parameter procedure among two groups and a control. It was found that there was a significant effect of implicit learning. These findings are analyzed in a behavioral aspect and taken into consideration for limitations, implications and future research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Janette Sierra, Pinecrest Preparatory High School

Teacher

Maryam Vaziri Pashkam, National Institue of Health

Advisor

References or Bibliography

Bandura, A. (1971) Social Learning Theory. General Learning Press.

Bandura, A. (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bird, G., Osman, M., Saggerson, A., & Heyes, C. (2005). Sequence learning by action, observation and action observation. British Journal of Psychology, 96(Pt 3), 371–388.

Blakemore, C. (1977). Mechanics of the Mind. Cambridge University Press.

Burke, D., & Roodenrys, S. (2000). Implicit learning in a simple cued reaction-time task. Learning and Motivation, 31. 364-380.

Caspers, S., Geyer S., Schleiher, A., Mohlberg, H., Amunts, K., & Zilles, K., (2006). The human inferior parietal cortex: cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability. Neuroimage 33.2, 430–448.

di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G., (1992). Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research 91, 176–180.

Heyes, C. M., & Foster, C. L. (2002). Motor learning by observation: Evidence from a serial reaction time task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 55(2), 593–607.

Howard, J. H., Jr, Mutter, S. A., & Howard, D. V. (1992). Serial pattern learning by event observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 18(5), 1029–1039.

Kanakogi, Y., & Itakura, S. (2010). The link between perception and action in early infancy: from the viewpoint of the direct-matching hypothesis. Journal of Psychology Research 52, 121–131.

Kelly, S., Burton, A., Riedel, B., & Lynch, E. (2003). Sequence learning by action and observation: Evidence for separate mechanisms. British Journal of Psychology 94. 355-372.

Lodish, H., Berk A., Zipursky, L., Matsudaira, P., Baltimore, D., & Darnell, J. (2000). Molecular Cell Biology. 4th edition. W. H. Freeman.

Maslovat, D., Hodges, N.J., Krigolson, O.E., Handy, T. (2010). Observational practice benefits are limited to perceptual improvements in the acquisition of a novel coordination skill. Experimental Brain Research 204, 119–130.

Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1–32.

Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious. Oxford University Press.

Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. National Reviews Neuroscience; 2(9):661–670.

Rizzolatti, G., Cattaneo, L., Fabbri-Destro, M., & Rozzi, S. (2014). Cortical mechanisms underlying the organization of goal-directed actions and mirror neuron-based action understanding. Physiological Reviews, 94(2), 655–706.

Rüsseler, J., & Rösler, F. (2000). Implicit and explicit learning of event sequences: evidence for distinct coding of perceptual and motor representations. Acta Psychologica, 104(1), 45–67.

Spielman, M., Dumper, K., Jenkins, W., Lovett, M., & Perlmutter, M. (2014). Psychology. OpenStax.

van Sommers, P. (1984). Drawing and Cognition: Descriptive and Experimental Studies of Graphic Production Processes. Cambridge University Press.

Vinter, A., & Perruchet, P. (1999). Isolating unconscious influences: The neutral parameter procedure. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 52(4), 857–875.

Vinter, A., & Perruchet, P. (2002). Implicit motor learning through observational training in adults and children. Memory & Cognition 30, 256–261.

Vogt, S. (1995). On relations between perceiving, imagining and performing in the learning of cyclical movement sequences. British Journal of Psychology, 86(2), 191–216.

Vogt, S., & Thomaschke, R. (2007). From visuo-motor interactions to imitation learning: behavioural and brain imaging studies. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(5), 497–517.

Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1047-1060.

Vaziri-Pashhkam, M. (2021) Personal communication [Email and video conferences].

Published

08-02-2021

How to Cite

Cairo, N., Sierra, J., & Vaziri Pashkam, M. (2021). Implicit Learning of Motor Behavior Through Observation in Middle-School Students. Journal of Student Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i2.1710

Issue

Section

AP Capstone™ Research