Somerset’s Case: The Unsung Verdict and Its Legacy

Authors

  • Sehoon Baek Naperville North High School
  • Mr. Jeffry Bedore Naperville North High School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i2.1485

Keywords:

Race, Verdict, History, American History, British History, Segregation, slavery, Abolition, Chattel Slavery, somerset's case, american revolution

Abstract

The paper is a comparison between the English court case Somerset v. Stewart(1772) and the infamous American suit Scott v. Sandford(1857), both of which deal with the issue of a slave’s freedom and seeks to analyze the reason why the judges overseeing these cases rendered different verdicts. The paper specifically explains the verdict of Somerset, which freed the slave in question, and Scott, which did not, in a socio-economic lens, pointing to the American dependency on slavery as a factor in the disenfranchisement of African-Americans, which was less of a factor in England that contributed to an early end to slavery in that country, including through the inclusion of black men in the Royal Army and Navy during Britain’s conflicts with the United States of America. Although a misinterpretation of Somerset’s Judge Lord Mansfield’s verdict, a wide-spread, broad understanding of his decision led to the acceptance of legal freedom for slaves throughout Britain, reinforcing American attempts to resist runaway attempts of slaves for British-controlled territory during the Revolutionary War and later the War of 1812. The paper finally renders the American Revolution as a hypocritical one that did not immediately contribute to equality, and notes Mansfield’s overlooked role in the abolition of chattel slavery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References or Bibliography

Primary Sources

David Keys. 2010. “Revealed: Industrial Revolution was powered by child slaves.” The Independent. August 2, 2010. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/revealed-industrial-revolution-was-powered-by-child-slaves-2041227.html.”

Equiano, Olaudah. “Chapter II.” In The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the African, London: W.Cock, 1815

Somerset v Stewart (1772) 98 ER 499

Secondary Sources

“Apprenticeship: slavery by another name?” PortCitiesBristol, Accessed January 2, 2020

“Britain and the Slave Trade.” National Archives, Accessed January 2, 2020

Gerzina, Gretchen. Black London: Life Before Emancipation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1995.

James Oliver Horton, Lois E. Horton. “Slavery and the Making of America.” Accessed January 20, 2020

“James Somerset, the Boston Runaway Who Ended Slavery in England.” New England Historical Society, Accessed January 2, 2020

“Life on board slave ships.” Liverpool Museums, Accessed January 2, 2020

Metaxas, Eric. Amazing Grace:William Wilberforce and the Heroic Campaign to end Slavery. New York: HarperCollins, 2007.

Olusoga, David. “The history of British slave ownership has been buried: now, its scale can be revealed.” The Guardian, Accessed March 30, 2020

Schneider, Dorothy and Schneider, Carl J. “Slavery in America: From Colonial Times to the Civil War.” Facts on File Library of American History, Accessed January 20, 2020

“Scott v. Sandford.” Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, Accessed March 28, 2020

“Selected Statistics on Slavery in the United States.” Weber State University, Accessed March 30, 2020

“Slave Trade Felony Bill.” Hansard, March 5, 1811

“The Civil War: The Senate’s History.” United States Senate. Accessed April 11, 2020.

“What was the Underground Railroad?” Harriet Tubman Historical Society, Accessed January 2, 2020

Published

07-01-2021

How to Cite

Baek, S., & Bedore, J. (2021). Somerset’s Case: The Unsung Verdict and Its Legacy. Journal of Student Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i2.1485

Issue

Section

HS Review Articles